The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL NEOPLASMS: INCIDENCE AND SURVIVAL DURING THE LAST 2 DECADES
Abstract
PURPOSE: Upper tract urothelial cancer is rare but studies in the 1970s showed that its incidence was increasing. We evaluated national trends of the incidence and survival of upper tract urothelial neoplasms from 1973 to 1996. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We obtained information on upper tract urothelial neoplasms from 1973 to 1996 from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program. To provide a time comparison we evaluated upper tract urothelial cancer from 1973 to 1984 and 1985 to 1996. We also calculated overall disease specific survival stratified by cancer stage, patient race and gender for the study period overall. RESULTS: A total of 9,072 cases of upper tract urothelial cancer were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program from 1973 to 1996, including 5,379 of the renal pelvis and 3,678 of the ureter. Comparing age adjusted annual incidence rates revealed an increase in ureteral neoplasms from 0.69 to 0.73/100,000 person-years but no change in the incidence of renal pelvic tumors, while the rate of in situ neoplasms increased from 7. 2% to 23.1%. Overall disease specific 5-year survival was significantly different in regard to tumor stage (95.1% in situ, 88. 9% localized, 62.6% regional and 16.5% distant lesions). Disease specific annual mortality was greater in black than in white individuals and in women than in men (7.4% versus 4.9% and 6.1% versus 4.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to have been a slight increase in the national incidence of ureteral tumors in the last 23 years. Fortunately we also detected a slight improvement in the overall disease specific survival of patients with upper tract neoplasms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Bladder cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Powles, T., Bellmunt, J., Comperat, E., De Santis, M., Huddart, R., Loriot, Y., Necchi, A., Valderrama, B. P., Ravaud, A., Shariat, S. F., et al. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.012 · Cited by 555
HOCK, L. M., LYNCH, J., & BALAJI, K. C. (2002) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65382-7 · Cited by 420
Identification of circulating microRNA signatures for upper tract urothelial carcinoma detection
TAO, J., YANG, X., LI, P., WEI, J., DENG, X., CHENG, Y., QIN, C., JU, X., MENG, X., LI, J., et al. (2015) · Molecular Medicine Reports · doi:10.3892/mmr.2015.4257 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- MUNOZ, J. J., & ELLISON, L. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1523-1525
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1991533123
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL NEOPLASMS: INCIDENCE AND SURVIVAL DURING THE LAST 2 DECADES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67019-x
- The paper
- MUNOZ, J. J., & ELLISON, L. M. (2000). UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL NEOPLASMS: INCIDENCE AND SURVIVAL DURING THE LAST 2 DECADES. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67019-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.