The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NONINVASIVE OUTCOME MEASURES OF URINARY INCONTINENCE AND LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS: A MULTICENTER STUDY OF MICTURITION DIARY AND PAD TESTS
Abstract
PURPOSE: We assessed the test-retest reliability of a 24, 48 and 72-hour micturition diary and pad test in patients referred for the evaluation of urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 109 patients referred for the evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms in our multicenter study. Patients were requested to complete a 72-hour micturition diary and pad test, and repeat each test during a 1-week interval. The test-retest reliability of various parameters of the 72-hour micturition diary and pad test was analyzed and compared. Further analysis was done to compare the test-retest reliability of 24, 48 and 72-hour studies performed on the same days after a 1-week interval. Reliability was assessed by Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) with a cutoff value of 0.7 indicating test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Of the 109 patients 106 (97%) with a median age of 64 years completed the study. The number of pads and total weight gain appeared to be reliable measures of the 24, 48 and 72-hour pad tests. For the 24-hour diary the total number of incontinence episodes was a reliable measure, while the total number of voiding episodes was marginally reliable (mean CCC 0.785 and 0. 689, respectively). For the 48-hour diary the number of incontinence episodes and total number of voiding episodes were reliable measures (mean CCC 0.78 and 0.83, respectively), while for the 72-hour diary each parameter was highly reliable (CCC 0.86 and 0.826, respectively). However, an increased test period was associated with decreased patient compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The 24-hour pad test and micturition diary are reliable instruments for assessing the degree of urinary loss and number of incontinent episodes, respectively. Increasing test duration to 48 and 72 hours increases reliability but is associated with decreased patient compliance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methodologic lessons learned from hot flash studies.
Sloan, J. A., Loprinzi, C. L., Novotny, P. J., Barton, D. L., Lavasseur, B. I., & Windschitl, H. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.23.4280 · Cited by 462
EAU Guidelines on Assessment and Nonsurgical Management of Urinary Incontinence
Lucas, M. G., Bosch, R. J. L., Burkhard, F. C., Cruz, F., Madden, T. B., Nambiar, A. K., Neisius, A., de Ridder, D. J. M. K., Tubaro, A., Turner, W. H., et al. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.047 · Cited by 422
Liu, Z., Liu, Y., Xu, H., He, L., Chen, Y., Fu, L., Li, N., Lu, Y., Su, T., Sun, J., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.7220 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- GROUTZ, A., BLAIVAS, J. G., CHAIKIN, D. C., RESNICK, N. M., ENGLEMAN, K., ANZALONE, D., BRYZINSKI, B., & WEIN, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 3 Part 1
- Pages
- 698-701
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2171975732
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NONINVASIVE OUTCOME MEASURES OF URINARY INCONTINENCE AND LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS: A MULTICENTER STUDY OF MICTURITION DIARY AND PAD TESTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67284-9
- The paper
- GROUTZ, A., BLAIVAS, J. G., CHAIKIN, D. C., RESNICK, N. M., ENGLEMAN, K., ANZALONE, D., BRYZINSKI, B., & WEIN, A. J. (2000). NONINVASIVE OUTCOME MEASURES OF URINARY INCONTINENCE AND LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS: A MULTICENTER STUDY OF MICTURITION DIARY AND PAD TESTS. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67284-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.