Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEXTANT AND AN EXTENDED 11-CORE MULTISITE DIRECTED BIOPSY STRATEGY

BABAIAN, R. JOSEPH, TOI, ANTS, KAMOI, KAZUMI, TRONCOSO, PATRICIA, SWEET, JOAN, EVANS, ROBERT, JOHNSTON, DENNIS, CHEN, MICHAEL·2000·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 3 tumor locations unsampled by conventional sextant biopsies that have been identified on composite 3-dimensional reconstruction of 180 radical prostatectomy specimens are the anterior transition zone, midline peripheral zone and inferior portions of the anterior horn in the peripheral zone. We evaluated an 11-core multisite directed biopsy scheme incorporating these alternate areas and conventional sextant biopsies in 362 patients from 2 institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients without a prior diagnosis of cancer underwent ultrasound guided 11-core biopsies which included conventional sextant and 3 alternate sites. All specimens were separated for specific location identification. Biopsy was performed in 183 patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center (group 1) and in 179 at Toronto General Hospital (group 2). All group 2 and 54% of group 1 patients (98 of 183) had a prior biopsy negative for cancer. RESULTS: Median prostate specific antigen was higher in group 2 than in group 1 patients (11.5 versus 9.5 ng./ml., p = 0.016). Overall a 33% increase (36 of 110 patients) in cancer detection was observed when biopsy technique included the alternate areas (p = 0.0021). The anterior horn was the most frequently positive biopsy site followed by the transition zone and midline sites. The 11-core technique had significantly better cancer detection rates when digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound were normal, and in men with serum prostate specific antigen between 4.1 and 10 ng./ml. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsies of the alternate sites suggested by our simulation studies are feasible and reproducible. This new strategy significantly enhanced (p = 0.0075) prostate cancer detection compared to conventional sextant biopsies in men undergoing a repeat procedure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67993-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
BABAIAN, R. J., TOI, A., KAMOI, K., TRONCOSO, P., SWEET, J., EVANS, R., JOHNSTON, D., & CHEN, M.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2000-01
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
152-157
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2068008878
Cited by
456
References
0
FWCI
25.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEXTANT AND AN EXTENDED 11-CORE MULTISITE DIRECTED BIOPSY STRATEGY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67993-1
The paper
BABAIAN, R. J., TOI, A., KAMOI, K., TRONCOSO, P., SWEET, J., EVANS, R., JOHNSTON, D., & CHEN, M. (2000). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEXTANT AND AN EXTENDED 11-CORE MULTISITE DIRECTED BIOPSY STRATEGY. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67993-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.