Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 463

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY URINARY URGE INCONTINENCE

SCHMIDT, RICHARD A., JONAS, UDO, OLESON, KIMBERLY A., JANKNEGT, RUUD A., HASSOUNA, MAGDY M., SIEGEL, STEVEN W., van KERREBROECK, PHILIP E.V.·1999·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized study was performed to evaluate sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of refractory urinary urge incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary outcome variables were obtained from voiding diaries. After baseline evaluation candidates who satisfied inclusion criteria were enrolled into the study. Test stimulation results determined eligibility for randomization into a stimulation (treatment) or delay (control) group. The stimulation group included 34 patients who underwent implantation and were followed for 6 months. The delay group comprised 42 patients who received standard medical therapy for 6 months and then were offered implantation. The stimulation group completed a therapy evaluation test (on versus off) after 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months the number of daily incontinence episodes, severity of episodes and absorbent pads or diapers replaced daily due to incontinence were significantly reduced in the stimulation compared to the delay group (all p<0.0001). Of the 34 stimulation group patients 16 (47%) were completely dry and an additional 10 (29%) demonstrated a greater than 50% reduction in incontinence episodes 6 months after implantation. Efficacy appeared to be sustained for 18 months. During the therapy evaluation test the group returned to baseline levels of incontinence when stimulation was inactivated. Urodynamic testing confirmed that sacral nerve stimulation did not adversely affect voiding function. Complications included implantable pulse generator site pain in 15.9% of the patients, implant site pain in 19.1% and lead migration in 7.0%. Surgical revision was required in 32.5% of patients with implants to resolve a complication. There were no reports of permanent injury or nerve damage. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral nerve stimulation is safe and effective in treating refractory urinary urge incontinence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68558-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 463

Metadata

Authors
SCHMIDT, R. A., JONAS, U., OLESON, K. A., JANKNEGT, R. A., HASSOUNA, M. M., SIEGEL, S. W., & van KERREBROECK, P. E. V.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
1999-08
Volume
162
Issue
2
Pages
352-357
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2096869731
Cited by
463
References
0
FWCI
21.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY URINARY URGE INCONTINENCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68558-8
The paper
SCHMIDT, R. A., JONAS, U., OLESON, K. A., JANKNEGT, R. A., HASSOUNA, M. M., SIEGEL, S. W., & van KERREBROECK, P. E. V. (1999). SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY URINARY URGE INCONTINENCE. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68558-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.