The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnosis of Prostatic Carcinoma: The Yield of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen, Digital Rectal Examination and Transrectal Ultrasonography
Abstract
Three tests are commonly used to diagnose prostate carcinoma to date: serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography. We evaluated these 3 tests in 1,001, 6-sector prostate needle biopsies to rule out prostate carcinoma. Of the biopsies 253 (25.3%) revealed prostate cancer. As a single test, PSA was superior to digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography in predicting cancer in this patient population using difference of proportions tests. Receiver operating characteristic analysis also showed PSA to be the superior test. The combinations of PSA plus transrectal ultrasonography and PSA plus digital rectal examination were superior to digital rectal examination plus transrectal ultrasonography. We found cancer in 35 of 188 patients (18.6%) with intermediate PSA levels of 4.1 to 10.0 ng./ml. and normal or asymmetric nonindurated rectal examinations. Only 5 of 79 patients (6.3%) with a normal digital rectal examination and PSA level of less than 4.0 ng./ml. demonstrated carcinoma on biopsy. Of the 5 patients 4 had annual increases in PSA of 40% or greater. While hypoechoic sectors were more than twice as likely as isoechoic sectors of the prostate to contain malignancy on biopsy, nearly 37.6% of the cancers were found in isoechoic sectors. A strategy of performing biopsy of only hypoechoic sectors would have misdiagnosed 24.6% of the patients with prostate cancer. We conclude that serum PSA is the most accurate of the 3 diagnostic tests evaluated. We also recommend a systematic sextant biopsy technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prostate‐specific antigen: A review of the validation of the most commonly used cancer biomarker
Hernández, J., & Thompson, I. M. (2004) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.20480 · Cited by 527
Hypermethylation of CpG Islands in Primary and Metastatic Human Prostate Cancer
Yegnasubramanian, S., Kowalski, J., Gonzalgo, M. L., Zahurak, M., Piantadosi, S., Walsh, P. C., Bova, G. S., De Marzo, A. M., Isaacs, W. B., & Nelson, W. G. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3972 · Cited by 527
Occult Prostate Cancer in Men With Low Serum Testosterone Levels
Morgentaler, A. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540230054035 · Cited by 279
Baniel, J., Israilov, S., Segenreich, E., & Livne, P. M. (2001) · BJU International · doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02254.x · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, W. J., Chetner, M. P., Preston, S. D., & Brawer, M. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 5 Part 1
- Pages
- 1520-1525
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W65565690
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of Prostatic Carcinoma: The Yield of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen, Digital Rectal Examination and Transrectal Ultrasonography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32460-6
- The paper
- Ellis, W. J., Chetner, M. P., Preston, S. D., & Brawer, M. K. (1994). Diagnosis of Prostatic Carcinoma: The Yield of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen, Digital Rectal Examination and Transrectal Ultrasonography. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32460-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.