The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Use of Prostate Specific Antigen, Clinical Stage and Gleason Score to Predict Pathological Stage in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Clinical stage, Gleason score and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels are used separately to predict pathological stage in patients with localized prostate cancer. Because the degree of tumor differentiation has a profound influence on the expression of serum PSA, serum PSA levels alone do not reflect tumor burden accurately. To overcome this obstacle we tested these 3 variables alone and in combinations as predictors of final pathological stage in 703 men with clinically localized prostate cancer at our institution. All patients were assigned a clinical stage by 1 urologist. The Gleason score was determined from preoperative needle biopsy and serum PSA levels were measured on an ambulatory basis. Final pathological stage was determined to be either organ confined, established capsular penetration, seminal vesicle involvement or lymph node involvement. Logistic regression analysis with the likelihood ratio chi-square test determined that serum PSA, Gleason score and clinical stage all predicted final pathological stage well. The results were improved with combinations of the 3 variables (serum PSA, Gleason score and clinical stage) and the combination provided the best separation. From these analyses probability plots and nomograms have been constructed to assist urologists in the preoperative prediction of final pathological stage for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heesakkers, R. A., Hövels, A. M., Jager, G. J., van den Bosch, H. C., Witjes, J. A., Raat, H. P., Severens, J. L., Adang, E. M., van der Kaa, C. H., Fütterer, J. J., et al. (2008) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70203-1 · Cited by 307
Yao, F., Hong, X., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Q., Du, W., Wang, Y., & Ni, J. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-180261 · Cited by 52
Prognostic Genomic Tissue-Based Biomarkers in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
Ingrosso, G., Alì, E., Marani, S., Saldi, S., Bellavita, R., & Aristei, C. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12010065 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Partin, A. W., Yoo, J., Carter, H. B., Pearson, J. D., Chan, D. W., Epstein, J. I., & Walsh, P. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-114
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W190857994
- Cited by
- 1,278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Use of Prostate Specific Antigen, Clinical Stage and Gleason Score to Predict Pathological Stage in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35410-1
- The paper
- Partin, A. W., Yoo, J., Carter, H. B., Pearson, J. D., Chan, D. W., Epstein, J. I., & Walsh, P. C. (1993). The Use of Prostate Specific Antigen, Clinical Stage and Gleason Score to Predict Pathological Stage in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35410-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.