The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frequency and Location of Extracapsular Extensionand Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
Abstract
Positive surgical margins have been reported with disturbing frequency in radical prostatectomy specimens and may portend an increased risk of eventual treatment failure. We determined the location of any cancer, extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in 144 consecutive step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens. Of the 46 stage A cancer patients 98% had residual cancer in the prostate after transurethral resection and in 76% cancer was found posteriorly in the gland. Extracapsular extension was identified in 10 patients (22%): anteriorly in 5, posterolaterally in 5 and on the most apical transverse section in 4. Positive margins were found in 10 patients (22%) and half of these occurred posterolaterally. Of the 98 stage B cancer patients tumor was located posteriorly in 97%. Extracapsular extension was found in 62 patients (63%) and in 87% of these it was located posterolaterally. Positive margins were found in 23%, most commonly in the posterolateral and rectal areas (57% and 26%, respectively), and in more than half of these the positive margin resulted from incision into the capsule. In 18 of the 144 patients (13%) a single positive surgical margin was the only pathological indicator of treatment failure and half of these occurred in the area of the neurovascular bundle. Some of these patients with extraprostatic tumor might have been cured if wide excision of the neurovascular bundle had been performed. Overemphasis on preservation of potency during radical prostatectomy may leave some patients with persistent local disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
GLEAVE, M. E., GOLDENBERG, S. L., CHIN, J. L., WARNER, J., SAAD, F., KLOTZ, L. H., JEWETT, M., KASSABIAN, V., CHETNER, M., DUPONT, C., et al. (2001) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65971-x · Cited by 326
Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Different View
Geary, E. S., Dendinger, T. E., Freiha, F. S., & Stamey, T. A. (1995) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67251-3 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosen, M. A., Goldstone, L., Lapin, S., Wheeler, T., & Scardino, P. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2 Part 1
- Pages
- 331-337
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W66741530
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency and Location of Extracapsular Extensionand Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36587-4
- The paper
- Rosen, M. A., Goldstone, L., Lapin, S., Wheeler, T., & Scardino, P. T. (1992). Frequency and Location of Extracapsular Extensionand Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36587-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.