The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sexual Function following Radical Prostatectomy: Influence of Preservation of Neurovascular Bundles
Abstract
The influence of preservation or excision of the neurovascular bundles on return of sexual function is analyzed. Between 1982 and 1988, 600 men 34 to 72 years old underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Of the 503 patients who were potent preoperatively and followed for a minimum of 18 months 342 (68%) are potent postoperatively. Three factors were identified that correlated with the return of sexual function: 1) age, 2) clinical and pathological stage, and 3) surgical technique (preservation or excision of the neurovascular bundle). In men less than 50 years old potency was similar in patients who had both neurovascular bundles preserved (90%) and patients who had 1 neurovascular bundle widely excised (91%). With advancing age of more than 50 years sexual function was better in patients in whom both neurovascular bundles were preserved than in patients in whom 1 neurovascular bundle was excised (p less than 0.05). When the relative risk of postoperative impotence was adjusted for age the risk of postoperative impotence was 2-fold greater if there was capsular penetration or seminal vesicle invasion, or if 1 neurovascular bundle was excised (p less than 0.05). These data indicate that the return of sexual function postoperatively in men more than 50 years old is quantitatively related to preservation of autonomic innervation. In these men when it is necessary to excise the neurovascular bundle on 1 side, consideration in the future should be given to approaches that may restore autonomic function through nerve regeneration, for example partial excision of the bundle or cavernous nerve grafts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2005) · doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2005.08.007 · Cited by 759
Disorders of Orgasm and Ejaculation in Men
Rowland, D., McMahon, C. G., Abdo, C., Chen, J., Jannini, E., Waldinger, M. D., & Ahn, T. Y. (2010) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01782.x · Cited by 508
FACTORS PREDICTING RECOVERY OF ERECTIONS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
RABBANI, F., STAPLETON, A. M. F., KATTAN, M. W., WHEELER, T. M., & SCARDINO, P. T. (2000) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66921-2 · Cited by 487
Prediction of Erectile Function Following Treatment for Prostate Cancer
Alemozaffar, M., Regan, M. M., Cooperberg, M. R., Wei, J. T., Michalski, J. M., Sandler, H. M., Hembroff, L., Sadetsky, N., Saigal, C. S., Litwin, M. S., et al. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1333 · Cited by 323
Lindsey, I., Guy, R. J., Warren, B. F., & Mortensen, N. J. M. (2000) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01542.x · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Quinlan, D. M., Epstein, J. I., Carter, B. S., & Walsh, P. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 998-1002
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1275039145
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual Function following Radical Prostatectomy: Influence of Preservation of Neurovascular Bundles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38512-9
- The paper
- Quinlan, D. M., Epstein, J. I., Carter, B. S., & Walsh, P. C. (1991). Sexual Function following Radical Prostatectomy: Influence of Preservation of Neurovascular Bundles. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38512-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.