The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrasound Guided Transrectal Core Biopsies of the Palpably Abnormal Prostate
Abstract
Ultrasound imaging and ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies were performed in 251 consecutive men with abnormal prostates on digital rectal examination. A hypoechoic defect on ultrasound was identified in 227 of 251 patients (90 per cent) corresponding to the area of palpable nodularity or abnormal firmness. A mean of 6.25 biopsies were obtained per patient using a commercially available spring-loaded gun. Biopsies were positive for cancer in 165 of the 251 prostates (66 per cent). Palpable nodules more often were hypoechoic and more often contained cancer than less distinct areas of abnormal firmness on digital examination. Among the clinical stages B1, B2 and B3 nodules 70, 76 and 88 per cent, respectively, were positive for cancer, as were 100 per cent of the clinical stage C prostates. Of 77 abnormally firm, nonnodular prostates 36 per cent were positive for cancer. Random biopsy of the contralateral normal lobe in 56 men with clinical stage B1 or B2 nodules showed cancer present contralaterally in 42 and 60 per cent, respectively; 20 per cent had positive biopsies despite a contralateral isoechoic ultrasound. In 78 patients with prior digitally guided biopsies, ultrasound guided biopsies confirmed previously diagnosed cancers in 94 per cent. However, in 23 of 43 patients (53 per cent) with previous negative digitally guided biopsies, ultrasound guided biopsies made the new diagnosis of cancer. Complications, including post-biopsy fever and bleeding, occurred in 6 of 251 patients (2.4 per cent). The combination of the new spring-loaded biopsy guns and transrectal ultrasound guidance of biopsies provides the urologist with a tool that allows multiple prostate cores to be obtained safely and painlessly, reducing the sampling error and increasing the accuracy in diagnosing prostate cancer in the man with a palpable abnormality of the prostate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Normal Histology of the Prostate
McNeal, J. E. (1988) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-198808000-00003 · Cited by 674
Self-citationPATTERNS OF PROGRESSION IN PROSTATE CANCER
Mcneal, J., Kindrachuk, R., Freiha, F., Bostwick, D., Redwine, E., & Stamey, T. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90715-4 · Cited by 582
Self-citationIntraductal dysplasia: A premalignant lesion of the prostate
McNeal, J. E., & Bostwick, D. G. (1986) · Human Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0046-8177(86)80156-3 · Cited by 573
Self-citation
Cited by
Nam, R. K., Saskin, R., Lee, Y., Liu, Y., Law, C., Klotz, L. H., Loblaw, D. A., Trachtenberg, J., Stanimirovic, A., Simor, A. E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.015 · Cited by 592
Baniel, J., Israilov, S., Segenreich, E., & Livne, P. M. (2001) · BJU International · doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02254.x · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodge, K. K., McNeal, J. E., & Stamey, T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-70
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1582198338
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound Guided Transrectal Core Biopsies of the Palpably Abnormal Prostate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38663-9
- The paper
- Hodge, K. K., McNeal, J. E., & Stamey, T. A. (1989). Ultrasound Guided Transrectal Core Biopsies of the Palpably Abnormal Prostate. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38663-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.