The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bladder Surface Glycosaminoglycans: An Epithelial Permeability Barrier
Abstract
Sulfated polysaccharide's ability to modulate the movement of small molecules was examined both in vivo and in vitro. For the in vivo test, the rabbit bladder was utilized and C-14 labeled urea 45-Ca, or 3H2O was placed into the lumen of control bladders, bladders pretreated with protamine sulfate (20 mg./cc) and bladders pretreated with protamine sulfate (20 mg./cc) plus pentosanpoly-sulfate (PPS), 10 mg./cc. After 45 minutes, the controls absorbed 21% of the urea, 16% of the calcium, and 38% of the 3H2O; the protamine treated group 40% urea, 23% calcium, and 51% H2O; the PPS only group 22% urea and the protamine plus PPS group absorbed 24% of urea, 18% calcium, and 44% water. Differences between the control and protamine groups were statistically significant, p less than 0.01 for urea 45-Ca and 3H2O. The bladder mucosa contained a significantly higher concentration of urea and calcium after protamine treatment which were both reversed by PPS (p less than 0.01) while 3H2O content went down significantly (p = 0.03), reflecting a loss of the hydrophilic effect of bladder GAG. The control mucosas had 250 cpm/mg. tissue urea for Ca 64 cpm/mg. and water 262 cpm/mg., the protamine group urea 498 cpm/mg., Ca 190 cpm/mg., and H2O 139 cpm/mg.; the protamine plus PPS group urea 344 cpm/mg., Ca 129 cpm/mg., and water 168 cpm/mg. For the in vitro studies, an Ussing chamber was employed. Normal rabbit bladder membranes were placed in the chambers and the potential difference was zeroed across the membrane. There were three groups, membranes that were treated only with the irrigating solution, membranes pretreated with protamine, and membranes pretreated with protamine plus PPS. At the end of 40 minutes, there was an approximately 1.2% movement of urea across the control membrane, a 3.5% movement across the protamine treated membrane (a significant increase p less than 0.001) and a 1.1% movement across the protamine plus PPS treated membrane. It would appear that the surface polysaccharide may play an important role as a bladder permeability barrier in modulating both charged and uncharged small molecule movement in that its ability to impair such movement can be inhibited by protamine and this protamine effect can be reversed by a treatment with an exogenous sulfated polysaccharide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stewart, F. A., Akleyev, A. V., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hendry, J. H., Kleiman, N. J., MacVittie, T. J., Aleman, B. M., Edgar, A. B., Mabuchi, K., Muirhead, C. R., et al. (2012) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001 · Cited by 1,604
The response of the urinary bladder, urethra, and ureter to radiation and chemotherapy
Marks, L. B., Carroll, P. R., Dugan, T. C., & Anscher, M. S. (1995) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)00431-j · Cited by 406
Vesicoureteral reflux and the extracellular matrix connection
Tokhmafshan, F., Brophy, P. D., Gbadegesin, R. A., & Gupta, I. R. (2017) · Pediatric Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s00467-016-3386-5 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Parsons, L., Boychuk, D., Jones, S., Hurst, R., & Callahan, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-142
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W118551320
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bladder Surface Glycosaminoglycans: An Epithelial Permeability Barrier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39897-x
- The paper
- Parsons, L., Boychuk, D., Jones, S., Hurst, R., & Callahan, H. (1990). Bladder Surface Glycosaminoglycans: An Epithelial Permeability Barrier. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39897-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.