The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Daily Spermatozoal Production and Epididymal Spermatozoal Reserves of the Human Male
Abstract
Testicular and epididymal spermatozoal reserves were determined for 11 healthy men, a vasectomized man and 12 other men. For healthy men testis weight (19 testes) averaged 16.9 plus or minus 1.2 gm. and daily spermatozoal production was 4.25 times 10(6) per gm. (range equals 1.4 to 6.3 times 10(6) per gm.). Based on our total sample (23 patients) 67 per cent of the men 20 to 50 years old probably produce between 45 times 10(6) and 207 times 10(6) spermatozoa per day. Daily spermatozoal production was normal in 1 vasectomized man. Epididymal reserves of healthy men totaled 182 times 10(6) spermatozoa per epididymis, of which 26 per cent were in the caput, 23 per cent in the corpus and 52 per cent in the cauda. The interval between any previous ejaculation and death was unknown but we assumed that these values are typical for men copulating or masturbating every 1 to 7 days. Extragonadal spermatozoal reserves totaled approximately 440 times 10(6), of which less than 225 times 10(6) would be available for ejaculation in the ductuli deferentia and caudae epididymides. Transit time of spermatozoa through the caput, corpus and cauda epididymidis was estimated as 0.72, 0.71 and 1.76 days. In a vasectomized man extragonadal reserves totaled 7 times 10(9) spermatozoa or about 75 days of production by the testes. Thus, spermatozoal production in man is much less efficient than in other mammals, the extragonadal reserves of spermatozoa are small and maturation of spermatozoa in the caput plus corpus epididymidis occurs in less than 2 days. In terms of these quantitative characteristics the reproductive capacity of man is considerably less than that of a rhesus monkey.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates
Harcourt, A. H., Harvey, P. H., Larson, S. G., & Short, R. V. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/293055a0 · Cited by 987
Environmental factors in declining human fertility
Skakkebæk, N. E., Lindahl-Jacobsen, R., Levine, H., Andersson, A.-M., Jørgensen, N., Main, K. M., Lidegaard, Ø., Priskorn, L., Holmboe, S. A., Bräuner, E. V., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-021-00598-8 · Cited by 389
The Cycle of the Seminiferous Epithelium in Humans: A Need to Revisit?
Amann, R. P. (2008) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.2164/jandrol.107.004655 · Cited by 324
Self-citationBjörndahl, L., & Kirkman Brown, J. (2022) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.012 · Cited by 267
Macronutrient balance, reproductive function, and lifespan in aging mice
Solon-Biet, S. M., Walters, K. A., Simanainen, U. K., McMahon, A. C., Ruohonen, K., Ballard, J. W. O., Raubenheimer, D., Handelsman, D. J., Le Couteur, D. G., & Simpson, S. J. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1422041112 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- Amann, R. P., & Howards, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1980-08
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-215
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W57151016
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Daily Spermatozoal Production and Epididymal Spermatozoal Reserves of the Human Male. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55377-x
- The paper
- Amann, R. P., & Howards, S. S. (1980). Daily Spermatozoal Production and Epididymal Spermatozoal Reserves of the Human Male. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55377-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.