Cited by 198Memory Processes and InfluencesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Order error in immediate recall of sequences

Conrad, R.·1965·Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5371(65)80015-9

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Conrad, R.
Affiliations
Medical Research Council (GB)
Corresponding author
Conrad, R.
Venue
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1965-06
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
161-169
ISSN
0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061201469
Cited by
198
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
immediate serial recall, transposition errors, acoustic similarity, memory models, vocabulary size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review