Effects of prior guessing on intentional and incidental paired-associate learning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Berlyne et al. (1968) found similar results for intentional learning of Turkish-English word pairs in adults, but did find an advantage of generating under incidental learning conditions.
“Berlyne, Carey, Lazare, Parlow, and Tiberius (1968) obtained similar findings for intentional learning of Turkish-English word pairs in adults.However, they did find an advantage of generating under incidental learning conditions”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as Berlyne, Carey, Lazare, Parlow, and Tiberius (1968)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The benefit of generating errors during learning
Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033194 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?
Vaughn, K. E., & Rawson, K. A. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0276-0 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Lighting the wick in the candle of learning: generating a prediction stimulates curiosity
Brod, G., & Breitwieser, J. (2019) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-019-0056-y · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berlyne, D. E., Carey, S. T., Lazare, S. A., Parlow, J., & Tiberius, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- ORCID
- Parlow, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1968-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 750-759
- ISSN
- 0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970760073
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Keywords
- paired-associate learning, intentional learning, incidental learning, category cues, subjective uncertainty, epistemic curiosity, word learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
