Modality tags and memory for repetitions: Locus of the spacing effect
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hintzman et al. (1973) found that learning produced by Study 2, rather than learning produced by Study 1, is decreased when the Study 2 presentation follows closely after the Study 1 presentation.
“One experimental result that appears to undercut consolidation theory is the finding of Hintzman et al. (1973), which suggests that learning produced by Study 2, rather than learning produced by Study 1, is decreased when the study 2 presentation follows closely after the study 1 presentation (see Murray, 1983, for arguments that this finding may not be definitive).”
From Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. (2006) · cites this paper as Hintzman et al. (1973)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Hintzman, D. L., Block, R. A., & Summers, J. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1973-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-238
- ISSN
- 0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058197645
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- spacing effect, incidental memory, word repetition, frequency judgment, modality switching, temporal order memory, retrieval failure, serial order memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
