Cited by 25,994Free Radicals and AntioxidantsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity

Open access
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M.E., Berset, C.·1995·LWT - Food Science and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0023-6438(95)80008-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 25,994

Authors
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C.
Corresponding author
Berset, C.
Venue
LWT - Food Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
25-30
ISSN
0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065853716
Cited by
25,994
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1741 · 2025: 1976 · 2024: 1904 · 2023: 1912 · 2022: 2143 · 2021: 2064 · 2020: 1981 · 2019: 1624 · 2018: 1434 · 2017: 1317 · 2016: 1163 · 2015: 1182 · 2014: 1049 · 2013: 912 · 2012: 760
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • LWT (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
antioxidant activity, DPPH radical, free radical scavenging, phenolic compounds, reaction kinetics, vitamin C, isoascorbic acid, isoeugenol, rosmarinic acid, tocopherols, caffeic acid, gentisic acid, gallic acid, vanillin, reaction stoichiometry, antioxidant defense

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review