The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0406 · Cited by 2,195
Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001 · Cited by 2,046
STUDYING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT: CHALLENGES FOR FUTURE RESEARCH.
Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069411 · Cited by 1,582
What Stakeholder Theory is Not
Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200313434 · Cited by 1,444
Workplace spirituality and employee work attitudes: An exploratory empirical assessment
Milliman, J., Czaplewski, A. J., & Ferguson, J. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534810310484172 · Cited by 1,302
Metadata
- Venue
- Long Range Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-262
- ISSN
- 0024-6301 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1579732355
- Cited by
- 2,304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 81.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0024-6301(96)90211-3
- The paper
- Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. (1996). Long Range Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(96)90211-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
