Cited by 91Gastrointestinal motility and disordersCongenital gastrointestinal and neural anomaliesGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility in Neurologie Diseases

CAMILLERI, MICHAEL·1990·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

Neurologic diseases can affect the bowel at several levels of innervation--by altering the electrical activity that controls smooth muscle, the enteric nervous system, or the extrinsic neural pathways to the gut. This review concentrates on disorders of motility that occur in conjunction with diseases of the extrinsic neural supply (from the level of the brain to the postganglionic fibers) and those generalized disorders that affect gut smooth muscle. Modern technology, such as gastrointestinal scintigraphy and manometric techniques that measure esophageal, gastroduodenal, and anorectal motility (intraluminal pressures), has provided better methods to study the pathophysiologic aspects of gut motility in diseases of the nervous system. Distinguishing the neuropathies of the extrinsic nervous system from those of the intrinsic (enteric) nervous system is not always possible because the available techniques evaluate only the end-organ--that is, the motor function of the gut. Degenerative or infiltrative (myopathic) disorders of gut smooth muscle, however, can be distinguished from such neuropathies, and careful and systematic evaluation of autonomic function can often identify the level of disordered function in the neural-gut axis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62574-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gastrointestinal involvement (vomiting, paralytic ileus, constipation, and chronic pseudo-obstruction) has been reported in acute, subacute, and congenital forms of pandysautonomia.

    “Gastrointestinal involvement (vomiting, paralytic ileus, constipation, and chronic pseudo-obstruction) has been reported in acute, subacute, and congenital forms (Camilleri, 1990; Suarez et al., 1994).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 161 · Cited by 91

Authors
CAMILLERI, M.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
CAMILLERI, MICHAEL
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-06
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
825-846
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988383325
Cited by
91
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30dk034988-05)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 34988)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
gastrointestinal motility disorders, neurological disorders, enteric nervous system, autonomic dysfunction, gastrointestinal scintigraphy, manometry, esophageal motility, gastroduodenal motility, anorectal motility
MeSH terms
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Brain Diseases, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Muscular Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review