Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility in Neurologie Diseases
Abstract
Neurologic diseases can affect the bowel at several levels of innervation--by altering the electrical activity that controls smooth muscle, the enteric nervous system, or the extrinsic neural pathways to the gut. This review concentrates on disorders of motility that occur in conjunction with diseases of the extrinsic neural supply (from the level of the brain to the postganglionic fibers) and those generalized disorders that affect gut smooth muscle. Modern technology, such as gastrointestinal scintigraphy and manometric techniques that measure esophageal, gastroduodenal, and anorectal motility (intraluminal pressures), has provided better methods to study the pathophysiologic aspects of gut motility in diseases of the nervous system. Distinguishing the neuropathies of the extrinsic nervous system from those of the intrinsic (enteric) nervous system is not always possible because the available techniques evaluate only the end-organ--that is, the motor function of the gut. Degenerative or infiltrative (myopathic) disorders of gut smooth muscle, however, can be distinguished from such neuropathies, and careful and systematic evaluation of autonomic function can often identify the level of disordered function in the neural-gut axis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gastrointestinal involvement (vomiting, paralytic ileus, constipation, and chronic pseudo-obstruction) has been reported in acute, subacute, and congenital forms of pandysautonomia.
“Gastrointestinal involvement (vomiting, paralytic ileus, constipation, and chronic pseudo-obstruction) has been reported in acute, subacute, and congenital forms (Camilleri, 1990; Suarez et al., 1994).”
From Autonomic nervous system and gastrointestinal manifestations with an emphasis on gastric dysfunction (2026) · cites this paper as Camilleri, 1990
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 161 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- CAMILLERI, M.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- CAMILLERI, MICHAEL
- ORCID
- CAMILLERI, MICHAEL
- Venue
- Mayo Clinic Proceedings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 825-846
- ISSN
- 0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988383325
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p30dk034988-05)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 34988)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Keywords
- gastrointestinal motility disorders, neurological disorders, enteric nervous system, autonomic dysfunction, gastrointestinal scintigraphy, manometry, esophageal motility, gastroduodenal motility, anorectal motility
- MeSH terms
- Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Brain Diseases, Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Muscular Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review