Cited by 76Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationVestibular and auditory disorders

Cochlear Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes: A complication Independent of Neuropathy and Acute Hyperglycemia

Sasso, Ferdinanco Carlo, Salvatore, Teresa, Tranchino, Gaetano, Cozzolino, Domenico, Caruso, Arturo Armone, Persico, Marcello, Gentile, Sandro, Torella, Daniele +1 more·1999·Metabolism

Abstract

The effects of type 2 diabetes on evoked otoacoustic emissions (e-OAEs) elicited by clicks in subjects with normal hearing and the involvement of the central (CNS) and peripheral nervous system and acute hyperglycemia were investigated. In study 1, 110 type 2 diabetic patients and 106 control subjects matched for age and gender were investigated by e-OAEs. Central and peripheral neuropathy were evaluated respectively by auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and according to San Antonio Consensus Conference criteria. In study 2, 10 healthy and 10 type 2 diabetic men matched for age, all with normal e-OAEs, underwent a 5-hour hyperglycemic clamp study. e-OAE tests were performed before and during the hyperglycemic clamp. In study 1, e-OAEs were impaired in 51.8% (57 of 110) of the diabetic subjects, in comparison to 4.7% (five of 106) of the control group (P < .0001). Diabetics with impaired e-OAEs (e-OAEs-), in comparison to those with normal e-OAEs (e-OAEs+), were older (51.0+/-5.8 v 45.1+/-6.0 years, P < .001), had diabetes longer (11.5+/-4.4 v 7.0+/-3.9 years, P < .001), achieved poorer metabolic control as judged by hemoglobin A1c ([HbA1c] 6.9%+/-0.4% v 6.5%+/-0.3%, P < .001), and had more peripheral neuropathy (46% v 23%, P < .02). No difference was observed between e-OAEs- and e-OAEs+ subjects for retinopathy or nephropathy. Nevertheless, when the duration of diabetes was corrected by multiple regression analysis, the correlation between sensorineural damage and peripheral…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0026-0495(99)90141-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sasso, F. C., Salvatore, T., Tranchino, G., Cozzolino, D., Caruso, A. A., Persico, M., Gentile, S., Torella, D., & Torella, R.
Affiliations
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Venue
Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-11
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
1346-1350
ISSN
0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976734399
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Funders
Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cochlear dysfunction, evoked otoacoustic emissions, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, hyperglycemia, auditory brainstem response, sensorineural hearing loss, hyperglycemic clamp, diabetes duration, metabolic control, HbA1c, diabetes complications, retinopathy, kidney disease, otoacoustic emissions
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Neuropathies, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Glucose Clamp Technique, Cochlear Diseases, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review