Cited by 98Cancer Treatment and PharmacologyDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Measurement of Fraction Unbound Paclitaxel in Human Plasma

Open access
Brouwer, Eric, Verweij, Jaap, De Bruijn, Peter, Loos, Walter J., Pillay, Marrimuthoo, Buijs, Dirk, Sparreboom, Alex·2000·Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Abstract

The clinical pharmacokinetic behavior of paclitaxel (Taxol) is distinctly nonlinear, with disproportional increases in systemic exposure with an increase in dose. We have recently shown that Cremophor EL, the formulation vehicle used for i.v. administration of paclitaxel, alters drug distribution as a result of micellar entrapment of paclitaxel, and we speculated that the free drug fraction (fu) is dependent on dose and time-varying concentrations of Cremophor EL in the central plasma compartment. To test this hypothesis, a reproducible equilibrium dialysis method has been developed for the measurement of paclitaxel fu in plasma. Equilibrium dialysis was performed at 37 degrees C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO(2) using 2.0-ml polypropylene test tubes. Experiments were carried out with 260-microliter aliquots of plasma containing a tracer amount of [G-(3)H]paclitaxel with high-specific activity against an equal volume of 0.01 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Drug concentrations were measured by both reversed-phase HPLC and liquid scintillation counting. Using this method, fu has been measured in three patients receiving three consecutive 3-weekly courses of paclitaxel at dose levels of 135, 175, and 225 mg/m(2) and found to range between 0.036 and 0.079. The method was also used to define concentration-time profiles of unbound drug, estimated from the product of the total plasma concentration and fu.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0026-895x(24)12040-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Taxane concentrations in the plasma of patients with cancer during chemotherapy reach between 0.1 and 1 μM.

    “A compound concentration of at least 5 µM was needed to induce a substantial effect (Fig. 1a,e), whereas taxane concentrations in the plasma of patients with cancer during chemotherapy reach concentrations of between 0.1 and 1 µM (refs. 47,48).”

    From Taxane-induced conformational changes in the microtubule lattice activate GEF-H1-dependent RhoA signalling (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Results and Discussion describe 0.03–1.2 μM as the anticipated paclitaxel concentration range for patient samples, which overlaps the cited 0.1–1 μM range. But those numbers were concentrations tested in blank plasma, not a reported range measured in patients; the study also concerns paclitaxel rather than taxanes generally. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 98

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shah VP, Midha KK, Dighe S, McGilveray IJ, Skelly JP, Yacobi A, Layloff T, Viswanathan CT, Cook CE, McDowall RD, Pittman KA and Spector S (1991) Analytical methods validation: Bioavailability, bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies. Conference report. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 16:249 -255.

Authors
Brouwer, E., Verweij, J., De Bruijn, P., Loos, W. J., Pillay, M., Buijs, D., & Sparreboom, A.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1141-1145
ISSN
0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136662093
Cited by
98
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
paclitaxel, unbound fraction, free drug fraction, plasma protein binding, Cremophor EL, nonlinear pharmacokinetics, dose-dependent binding, equilibrium dialysis, drug distribution, concentration-time profiles
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Binding, Competitive, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Glycerol, Humans, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Middle Aged, Plasma, Paclitaxel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review