Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rhodamine efflux patterns predict P-glycoprotein substrates in the National Cancer Institute drug screen.

Lee, J S, Paull, K, Alvarez, M, Hose, C, Monks, A, Grever, M, Fojo, A T, Bates, S E·1994·Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

Fifty-eight cell lines in the National Cancer Institute drug screen were analyzed for their ability to efflux the fluorescent dye rhodamine 123 as a functional assay for P-glycoprotein (Pgp). Using flow cytometry, the rhodamine fluorescence was measured for each cell line under four incubation conditions, i.e., after accumulation in the presence or absence of the Pgp antagonist cyclosporin A and after efflux in rhodamine-free medium in the presence or absence of cyclosporin A. The results in some cell lines were compatible with Pgp-mediated efflux. There was a significant correlation between mdr-1 expression and rhodamine efflux in the 58 cell lines (r = 0.788, p = 0.0001). Using the rhodamine efflux data as a seed for COMPARE analysis with the cytotoxicity data on > 30,000 compounds in the National Cancer Institute drug screen database, hundreds of compounds with high correlation coefficients were identified. Selected compounds were tested for reversal of cross-resistance in a multidrug-resistant cell line. A high degree of reversibility, up to 10,000-fold, for some of the compounds was noted in the presence of the Pgp antagonist PSC 833. This finding suggested that compounds with predominately Pgp-mediated resistance were being identified. Using these compounds as seeds for COMPARE analysis against a more restricted database of 187 standard agents, a series of standard compounds were repeatedly identified as having high correlation coefficients with the newly identified Pgp substrates. These standard agents, including phyllanthoside, bisantrene, and homoharringtonine, constitute an mdr-1 profile. New agents identified as being highly correlated with these compounds may benefit from clinical trials with Pgp antagonists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0026-895x(25)09793-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J. S., Paull, K., Alvarez, M., Hose, C., Monks, A., Grever, M., Fojo, A. T., & Bates, S. E.
Venue
Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-10
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
627-638
ISSN
0026-895X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1925657344
Cited by
336
References
0
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhodamine efflux patterns predict P-glycoprotein substrates in the National Cancer Institute drug screen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)09793-7
The paper
Lee, J. S., Paull, K., Alvarez, M., Hose, C., Monks, A., Grever, M., Fojo, A. T., & Bates, S. E. (1994). Rhodamine efflux patterns predict P-glycoprotein substrates in the National Cancer Institute drug screen. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)09793-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.