Cloning and expression of a human Ah receptor cDNA.
Abstract
In this report, we describe the cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding a human Ah receptor, a basic/helix-loop-helix protein that mediates the toxic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. A comparison of this human cDNA with a murine homologue (Ahb1 allele) indicates that the molecular mass variation observed between the receptors found in these two species results from hypervariability of amino acid sequences in the carboxyl termini (< 60% conserved over 450 amino acids). Differential usage of stop codons generates proteins with molecular masses that differ by 6 kDa. In contrast, the amino-terminal halves of these proteins are highly conserved and show 90% amino acid sequence identity. Northern blot analysis indicates that the human Ah receptor mRNA is expressed at its highest levels in placenta and is also highly expressed in lung, heart, pancreas, and liver, with lower levels of expression found in brain, kidney, and skeletal muscle. Expression of the human cDNA in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system allowed functional analysis of ligand binding, agonist-induced and Ah receptor nuclear translocator-dependent DNA binding, and receptor stabilization by sodium molybdate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human AHR position 381, homologous to mouse position 375, has a valine residue predicted to confer low affinity binding.
“In this regard, position 381 of the human AHR, a position homologous to mouse 375, harbors a V residue and is predicted to confer the low affinity binding phenotype on this receptor form (Dolwick, Schmidt, et al., 1993).”
From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Dolwick, Schmidt, et al., 1993
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 348
- Authors
- Dolwick, K. M., Schmidt, J. V., Carver, L. A., Swanson, H. I., & Bradfield, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 911-917
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162400904
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 17.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (T32 CA09560, T32CA009560)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES-05703, F32ES005589, ES-05589)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
- Keywords
- aryl hydrocarbon receptor, bHLH transcription factors, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, dioxin toxicity, ligand binding, DNA binding, nuclear translocation, sodium molybdate, placenta
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Cells, Cultured, Cloning, Molecular, HeLa Cells, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Recombinant Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Blotting, Northern, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, DNA, Complementary, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review