The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Quantitative Analysis of Beta-Adrenergic Receptor Interactions: Resolution of High and Low Affinity States of the Receptor by Computer Modeling of Ligand Binding Data
Abstract
The properties of ligand binding to the beta-adrenergic receptor have been studied using a computer modeling technique to analyze data obtained by indirect binding methods. Antagonists are shown to bind to the receptor with one homogeneous state of uniform affinity, while agonists manifest heterogeneous binding. For agonists, two distinct binding states are apparent; one of high and one of low affinity. Affinity states of the receptor are characterized by specific macroscopic dissociation constants, and the proportion of total receptors in each state can be determined. The ability of an agonist to activate adenylate cyclase (intrinsic activity) correlates closely with the amount of high affinity state formed in the presence of the agonist (p
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Operational models of pharmacological agonism
Black, J. W., & Leff, P. (1983) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1983.0093 · Cited by 951
Raval, N. R., Johansen, A., Donovan, L. L., Ros, N. F., Ozenne, B., Hansen, H. D., & Knudsen, G. M. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22020835 · Cited by 200
Park, P. S.-H., Lodowski, D. T., & Palczewski, K. (2008) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094630 · Cited by 131
Finnema, S. J., Stepanov, V., Ettrup, A., Nakao, R., Amini, N., Svedberg, M., Lehmann, C., Hansen, M., Knudsen, G. M., & Halldin, C. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.035 · Cited by 72
Gurguis, G. N. M., Andrews, R., Antai-Otong, D., Vo, S. P., Blakeley, J. E., Orsulak, P. J., & Rush, A. J. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130050928 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- KENT, R. S., DE LEAN, A., & LEFKOWITZ, R. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-23
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2186676367
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
