Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Non-random radial arrangements of interphase chromosome territories: evolutionary considerations and functional implications

Open access
Tanabe, Hideyuki, Habermann, Felix A, Solovei, Irina, Cremer, Marion, Cremer, Thomas·2002·Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Abstract

In the nucleus of animal and plant cells individual chromosomes maintain a compartmentalized structure. Chromosome territories (CTs), as these structures were named by Theodor Boveri, are essential components of the higher-order chromatin architecture. Recent studies in mammals and non-mammalian vertebrates indicate that the radial position of a given CT (or segments thereof) is correlated with its size, its gene-density and its replication timing. As a representative case, chicken cell nuclei show highly consistent radial chromatin arrangements: gene-rich, early replicating microchromosomes are clustered within the nuclear interior, while gene-poor, later replicating macrochromosomes are preferentially located at the nuclear periphery. In humans, chromosomes 18 and 19 (HSA18 and 19) territories that are of similar size show a distinctly different position in the cell nuclei of lymphocytes and lymphoblastoid cells: the gene-rich and early replicating HSA19 CTs are typically found close to the nuclear center, while the gene-poor and later replicating HSA18 CTs are preferentially located at the nuclear periphery. Recent comparative maps between human and chicken chromosomes revealed that the chicken macrochromosomes 2 and Z contain the genes homologous to HSA18, while the genes on HSA19 are located onto the chicken microchromosomes. These data lend tentative support to the hypothesis that differences in the radial nuclear positions of gene-rich, early replicating and gene-poor, later replicating chromatin have been evolutionarily conserved during a period of more than 300 million years irrespective of the evolution of highly divergent karyotypes between humans and chicken.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00077-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Tanabe, H., Habermann, F. A., Solovei, I., Cremer, M., & Cremer, T.
Venue
Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
504
Issue
1-2
Pages
37-45
ISSN
  • 0027-5107 (ISSN-L)
  • 1386-1964
OpenAlex
W2060228572
Cited by
164
References
0
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-random radial arrangements of interphase chromosome territories: evolutionary considerations and functional implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00077-5
The paper
Tanabe, H., Habermann, F. A., Solovei, I., Cremer, M., & Cremer, T. (2002). Non-random radial arrangements of interphase chromosome territories: evolutionary considerations and functional implications. Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00077-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.