Long-lasting inactivation of nicotinic receptor function in vitro by treatment with high concentrations of nicotine
Abstract
Exposure of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) to brief pulses of nicotine results in the stimulation of dopamine release, whereas prolonged treatment with low concentrations of nicotine (approximately 10 nM) produces a reversible blockade of a subsequent nicotine challenge as a result of nAChR desensitization. We and others have observed that, following prolonged treatment with stimulating (microM) concentrations of nicotine, there is incomplete recovery from desensitization. In this study we investigated this nonrecoverable component by characterizing the ability of nicotine to stimulate [3H]dopamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes following recovery from nicotine-induced desensitization. Brief (12 s) exposure to 30 microM nicotine, or longer exposure (> or = 5 min) to 0.3 microM nicotine produced a long-lasting decrease in nAChR function with an apparent IC50 of 0.7 microM. The maximal inactivation achieved was approximately 50%. Recovery of nAChR function did not return even after 5 h, whereas recovery from desensitization occurred within 20 min. Determinations of the concentration of nicotine in the superfusate indicated that residual nicotine could not account for the observed decrease in response as a consequence of desensitization. These results indicate that high concentrations of nicotine can produce a long-lasting nAChR inactivation which can be distinguished from reversible nAChR desensitization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lower doses of nicotine, consistent with those in the blood of human smokers, result in desensitization rather than activation of nAChRs as measured by nicotine-dependent dopamine release in striatal synaptosomes.
“Studies in striatal synaptosomes, however, show that lower doses of nicotine, consistent with those in the blood of human smokers, result in desensitization rather than activation of nAChRs as measured by nicotine-dependent dopamine release (Grady et al., 1992; Grady et al., 1994; Rowell and Duggan, 1998; Rowell and Hillebrand, 1994).”
From It is not “either/or”: Activation and desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors both contribute to behaviors related to nicotine addiction and mood (2008) · cites this paper as Rowell and Duggan, 1998
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Rowell, P. P., & Duggan, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rowell, Peter P
- Venue
- Neuropharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-111
- ISSN
- 0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058318308
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01da007479-08)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA07479)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Keywords
- nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, nicotine, receptor desensitization, receptor inactivation, dopamine release, striatal synaptosomes, recovery from desensitization
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dopamine, Male, Nicotine, Receptors, Nicotinic, Synaptosomes, Neostriatum, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Nicotinic Agonists, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review