Cited by 184Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Increased synaptic depression in the Ts65Dn mouse, a model for mental retardation in Down syndrome

Siarey, Richard J, Carlson, Elaine J, Epstein, Charles J, Balbo, Andrea, Rapoport, Stanley I, Galdzicki, Zygmunt·1999·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) were investigated in hippocampus of a genetic model of Down syndrome, the segmental trisomy (Ts65Dn) mouse. Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials were recorded from hippocampal slices and LTP and LTD evoked sequentially. LTP decreased whereas LTD increased significantly in Ts65Dn compared with control hippocampus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0028-3908(99)00083-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from mouse models of Down syndrome, particularly the Ts65Dn model, show reduced long-term potentiation and increased long-term depression, reflecting the relative strengthening and weakening, respectively, of individual synapses.

    “This suggestion is largely driven by findings from mouse models of DS, particularly the Ts65Dn model, in which patch clamp electrophysiology analyses reveal reduced long-term potentiation (LTP) and increased long-term depression (LTD), reflecting the relative strengthening and weakening, respectively, of individual synapses123–126.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 184

Authors
Siarey, R. J., Carlson, E. J., Epstein, C. J., Balbo, A., Rapoport, S. I., & Galdzicki, Z.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Galdzicki, Zygmunt
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
1917-1920
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968536098
Cited by
184
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd031498-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-08938, P01AG008938)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-31498)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Ts65Dn mouse model, Down syndrome, synaptic depression, long-term depression, long-term potentiation, hippocampus, intellectual disability, field excitatory postsynaptic potentials, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Down Syndrome, Hippocampus, Intellectual Disability, Long-Term Potentiation, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review