Cited by 575Cognitive Functions and MemoryNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory Processes and Influences

Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography

Burgess, Paul W., Quayle, Angela, Frith, Christopher D.·2001·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Prospective memory (PM) refers to the functions that enables a person to carry out an intended act after a delay. Despite the ubiquity of this behaviour, little is known about the supporting brain structures and the roles that they play. In this study, eight healthy participants performed four different PM tasks, each under three conditions: a baseline, and two conditions involving an intention. In the first of the intention conditions, subjects were asked to make a novel response to a certain class of stimuli whilst performing an attention-demanding task. However, the expected stimuli never actually occurred. In the second intention condition subjects were expecting to see these stimuli as before, and they did occur on approximately 20% of trials. Relative to the baseline condition, increases in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as estimated by oxygen-15 positron emission tomography technique across all four tasks were seen in the frontal pole (Brodmann's area 10) bilaterally, right lateral prefrontal and inferior parietal regions plus the precuneus when subjects were expecting a PM stimulus regardless of whether it actually occurred. Further activation was seen in the thalamus when the PM stimuli occurred and was acted upon, with a corresponding rCBF decrease in right lateral prefrontal cortex. It is argued that the first set of region play a role in the maintenance of an intention, with the second set involved additionally in its realisation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00149-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 575

Authors
Burgess, P. W., Quayle, A., & Frith, C. D.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Burgess, Paul W.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
545-555
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140696527
Cited by
575
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 32
FWCI
25.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
prospective memory, frontal pole, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, precuneus, thalamus, regional cerebral blood flow, attention-demanding tasks, brain activation
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Memory, Occipital Lobe, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review