Acquisition of novel semantic information in amnesia: effects of lesion location
Abstract
Two patients with severe global amnesia are described who differ in the extent to which they have acquired new semantic information. Patient SS, who has extensive medial temporal lobe damage including the hippocampus as well as surrounding cortical areas, has failed to acquire virtually any new information regarding vocabulary or famous faces that entered the public domain since the onset of his amnesia. In contrast, patient PS, who has a selective lesion of the hippocampus proper, has gained a sense of familiarity of novel vocabulary and famous people, even though her effortful retrieval of this new semantic knowledge remains impaired. These findings extend to amnesia of adult onset, the proposal of Vargha-Khadem and colleagues that in patients with selective hippocampal injury, cortical areas surrounding the hippocampus may play an important role in new semantic learning [Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D.G., Watkins, K. E., Connelly, A., Van Paesschen, W. and Mishkin, M., regarding the importance of the subhippocampal cortices in the mediation of new semantic learning in children with hippocampal lesions, Science, 1997, 277, 376-380].
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A few HSV-1 patients followed longitudinally over long periods display persistent severe anterograde and retrograde amnesia, with relatively preserved remote memories, the hallmark of bilateral hippocampal lesions.
“A few patients followed longitudinally over long periods [39–46], display persistent severe anterograde and retrograde amnesia, with relatively preserved remote memories, the hallmark of bilateral hippocampal lesions.”
From Cognitive decline following acute viral infections: literature review and projections for post-COVID-19 (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Verfaellie, M., Koseff, P., & Alexander, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Verfaellie, M
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 484-492
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047977471
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH057681, MH57681)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-26985, P50NS026985)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- semantic memory, global amnesia, hippocampal lesions, medial temporal lobe, familiarity, lesion localization, vocabulary acquisition, face recognition (cognition)
- MeSH terms
- Amnesia, Hypoxia, Asthma, Herpesviridae Infections, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Temporal Lobe, Verbal Learning, Vocabulary, Encephalitis, Viral, Knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review