The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To relate interdelivery interval to risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all women who had a trial of labor after cesarean delivery over 12 years (July 1984 to June 1996). Analysis was limited to women with only one prior cesarean delivery and no prior vaginal deliveries who delivered term singletons and whose medical records included the month and year of the prior delivery. The time in months between the prior cesarean delivery and the index trial of labor was calculated, and the women were divided accordingly to permit comparison with respect to symptomatic uterine rupture. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred nine women had trials of labor after one prior cesarean delivery and had complete data from the medical records. There were 29 uterine ruptures (1.2%) in the population. For interdelivery intervals up to 18 months, the uterine rupture rate was 2.25% (seven of 311) compared with 1.05% (22 of 2098) with intervals of 19 months or longer (P =.07). Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the risk of uterine rupture according to interdelivery interval while controlling for maternal age, public assistance, length of labor, gestational age at least 41 weeks, and oxytocin use. Women with interdelivery intervals of up to 18 months were three times as likely (95% confidence interval, 1.2, 7.2) to have symptomatic uterine rupture. CONCLUSION: Interdelivery intervals of up to 18 months were associated with increased risk of symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean delivery compared with that for longer interdelivery intervals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Justus Hofmeyr, G., Say, L., & Metin Gülmezoglu, A. (2005) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.x · Cited by 379
Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort
Eller, A., Bardsley, T., Greene, T., Varner, M., Silver, R., & Bowman, Z. (2013) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1361833 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Shipp, T.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-177
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052625306
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01129-7
- The paper
- Shipp, T. (2001). Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01129-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.