Intrauterine growth restriction
Abstract
Fetal intrauterine growth restriction presents a complex management problem for the clinician. The failure of a fetus to achieve its growth potential imparts a significantly increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Consequently, the obstetrician must recognize and accurately diagnose inadequate fetal growth and attempt to determine its cause. Growth aberrations, which are the result of intrinsic fetal factors such as aneuploidy and multifactorial congenital malformations, and fetal infection, carry a guarded prognosis. However, when intrauterine growth restriction is caused by placental abnormalities or maternal disease, the growth aberration is usually the consequence of inadequate substrates for fetal metabolism and, to a greater or lesser degree, decreased oxygen availability. Careful monitoring of fetal growth and well-being, combined with appropriate timing and mode of delivery, can best ensure a favorable outcome. Ultrasound evaluation of fetal growth, behavior, and measurement of impedance to blood flow in fetal arterial and venous vessels form the cornerstone of evaluation of fetal condition and decision making.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Suboptimal perfusion of the maternal placental circulation is the most common cause of fetal growth restriction and accounts for 25%-30% of all cases.
“Suboptimal perfusion of the maternal placental circulation is the most common cause of FGR and accounts for 25e30% of all cases.2,3”
From Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Chromosomal disorders and congenital malformations are responsible for approximately 20% of fetal growth restriction cases.
“Chromosomal disorders and congenital malformations are responsible for approximately 20% of FGR cases.2,3”
From Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Up to 20% of early-onset fetal growth restriction cases are associated with fetal or chromosomal abnormalities.
“We recommend that a detailed obstetrical ultrasound examination (current procedural terminology code 76811) be performed with early-onset FGR because up to 20% of cases are associated with fetal or chromosomal abnormalities 2,3,84,85 (GRADE 1B).”
From Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 172 · Cited by 1,022
- Authors
- Resnik, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Resnik, R
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 490-496
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980039229
- Cited by
- 1,022
- References
- 172
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 46.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- fetal growth restriction, fetal growth, perinatal morbidity, aneuploidy, congenital malformations, fetal infection, placental abnormalities, maternal illness, fetal growth monitoring, timing of delivery, mode of delivery, prenatal ultrasound
- MeSH terms
- Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review