Cited by 1,022Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Intrauterine growth restriction

Resnik, R·2002·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Fetal intrauterine growth restriction presents a complex management problem for the clinician. The failure of a fetus to achieve its growth potential imparts a significantly increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Consequently, the obstetrician must recognize and accurately diagnose inadequate fetal growth and attempt to determine its cause. Growth aberrations, which are the result of intrinsic fetal factors such as aneuploidy and multifactorial congenital malformations, and fetal infection, carry a guarded prognosis. However, when intrauterine growth restriction is caused by placental abnormalities or maternal disease, the growth aberration is usually the consequence of inadequate substrates for fetal metabolism and, to a greater or lesser degree, decreased oxygen availability. Careful monitoring of fetal growth and well-being, combined with appropriate timing and mode of delivery, can best ensure a favorable outcome. Ultrasound evaluation of fetal growth, behavior, and measurement of impedance to blood flow in fetal arterial and venous vessels form the cornerstone of evaluation of fetal condition and decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01780-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 172 · Cited by 1,022

Authors
Resnik, R.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Resnik, R
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2002-03
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
490-496
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980039229
Cited by
1,022
References
172
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 61
FWCI
46.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
fetal growth restriction, fetal growth, perinatal morbidity, aneuploidy, congenital malformations, fetal infection, placental abnormalities, maternal illness, fetal growth monitoring, timing of delivery, mode of delivery, prenatal ultrasound
MeSH terms
Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review