The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Weight gain in women of normal weight before pregnancy: complications in pregnancy or delivery and birth outcome*1
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between gestational weight gain in women of normal prepregnant weight and complications during pregnancy and delivery in a population with high gestational weight gain and birth weight. METHODS: Healthy women (n = 615) of normal weight before pregnancy (body mass index 19.5-25.5 kg/m(2)) were randomly selected. Maternity records gave information on age, height, prepregnant weight, gestational weight gain, parity, smoking, gestational hypertension and diabetes, preeclampsia, delivery complications, and infants' birth size and health. RESULTS: The mean weight gain in pregnancy was 16.8 +/- 4.9 kg (mean +/- standard deviation). A total of 26.4% of the women had complications, either in pregnancy (9.1%) or delivery (17.3%). Women gaining weight according to the recommendation of the Institute of Medicine (11.5-16.0 kg) had lower frequency of pregnancy-delivery complications than women gaining more than 20.0 kg (P =.017), but did not differ significantly from those gaining 16-20 kg (P >.05). When dividing weight gain in pregnancy into quintiles, a relative risk of 2.69 (95% confidence interval 1.01, 7.18, P =.048) was found for complications in pregnancy in the fourth quintile (17.9-20.8 kg), using the second quintile as reference (12.5-15.5 kg). The mean birth weight was 3778 +/- 496 g. A low weight gain in pregnancy (less than 11.5 kg) was associated with an increased frequency of infants weighing less than 3500 g at birth (P <.01). CONCLUSION: A gestational weight gain of 11.5-16.0 kg (Institute of Medicine recommendation) for women of normal prepregnant weight is related to the lowest risk for pregnancy-delivery complications. In the population studied, the upper limit might be higher (up to 18 kg), and low weight gain should be avoided to optimize birth outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Siega-Riz, A. M., Viswanathan, M., Moos, M.-K., Deierlein, A., Mumford, S., Knaack, J., Thieda, P., Lux, L. J., & Lohr, K. N. (2009) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.002 · Cited by 708
Nohr, E. A., Vaeth, M., Baker, J. L., Sørensen, T. I., Olsen, J., & Rasmussen, K. M. (2008) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/87.6.1750 · Cited by 649
The Effect of Fast Food Restaurants on Obesity and Weight Gain
Currie, J., DellaVigna, S., Moretti, E., & Pathania, V. (2010) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.2.3.32 · Cited by 388
The effect of gestational weight gain by body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes
Crane, J. M. G., White, J., Murphy, P., Burrage, L., & Hutchens, D. (2009) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34050-6 · Cited by 363
Haugen, M., Brantsæter, A. L., Winkvist, A., Lissner, L., Alexander, J., Oftedal, B., Magnus, P., & Meltzer, H. M. (2014) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-201 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- THORSDOTTIR, I.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 799-806
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044840466
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weight gain in women of normal weight before pregnancy: complications in pregnancy or delivery and birth outcome*1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01946-4
- The paper
- THORSDOTTIR, I. (2002). Weight gain in women of normal weight before pregnancy: complications in pregnancy or delivery and birth outcome*1. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01946-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.