Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Natural history of uterine polyps and leiomyomata

DeWaay, D·2002·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and regression rates of uterine leiomyomata and polyps in a cohort of asymptomatic, premenopausal women. METHODS: Saline infusion sonography was performed twice, 2.5 years apart, in a cohort of 64 initially asymptomatic women. Subjects completed a questionnaire that assessed the development of abnormal uterine bleeding. RESULTS: The mean age of women (at second ultrasound) was 44 years. In four of seven women with polyps at the original ultrasound, their polyps regressed. Polyps that regressed tended to be smaller than polyps that persisted. Ten women had endometrial polyps at the second ultrasound for a point prevalence of 16% and a cumulative incidence rate of 12% per 2.5 years. A higher percentage of women with uterine polyps had complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding than women with no uterine abnormalities (70% versus 33%, P =.04). Six leiomyomata in four women were no longer detected in the second ultrasound. Leiomyomata that regressed were in older premenopausal women and were smaller than leiomyomata that persisted. The point prevalence and incidence rates of leiomyomata were 27% and 13% per 2.5 years, respectively. Leiomyomata grew an average of 1.2 cm per 2.5 years, but great variation in growth rates were noted. CONCLUSION: Small uterine polyps frequently regressed spontaneously, whereas larger polyps were more likely to persist and were associated with the development of abnormal bleeding. Smaller leiomyomata in older premenopausal women also regressed whereas larger leiomyomata tended to grow while often remaining asymptomatic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02007-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
DeWaay, D.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2002-07
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
3-7
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050379279
Cited by
276
References
0
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural history of uterine polyps and leiomyomata. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02007-0
The paper
DeWaay, D. (2002). Natural history of uterine polyps and leiomyomata. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02007-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.