The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Natural history of uterine polyps and leiomyomata
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and regression rates of uterine leiomyomata and polyps in a cohort of asymptomatic, premenopausal women. METHODS: Saline infusion sonography was performed twice, 2.5 years apart, in a cohort of 64 initially asymptomatic women. Subjects completed a questionnaire that assessed the development of abnormal uterine bleeding. RESULTS: The mean age of women (at second ultrasound) was 44 years. In four of seven women with polyps at the original ultrasound, their polyps regressed. Polyps that regressed tended to be smaller than polyps that persisted. Ten women had endometrial polyps at the second ultrasound for a point prevalence of 16% and a cumulative incidence rate of 12% per 2.5 years. A higher percentage of women with uterine polyps had complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding than women with no uterine abnormalities (70% versus 33%, P =.04). Six leiomyomata in four women were no longer detected in the second ultrasound. Leiomyomata that regressed were in older premenopausal women and were smaller than leiomyomata that persisted. The point prevalence and incidence rates of leiomyomata were 27% and 13% per 2.5 years, respectively. Leiomyomata grew an average of 1.2 cm per 2.5 years, but great variation in growth rates were noted. CONCLUSION: Small uterine polyps frequently regressed spontaneously, whereas larger polyps were more likely to persist and were associated with the development of abnormal bleeding. Smaller leiomyomata in older premenopausal women also regressed whereas larger leiomyomata tended to grow while often remaining asymptomatic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Etiology, symptomatology, and diagnosis of uterine myomas
Parker, W. H. (2007) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.093 · Cited by 721
Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Uterine Fibroids
Pavone, D., Clemenza, S., Sorbi, F., Fambrini, M., & Petraglia, F. (2018) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.004 · Cited by 365
AAGL Practice Report: Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Polyps
(2012) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2011.09.003 · Cited by 280
The Oncogenic Potential of Endometrial Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lee, S. C., Kaunitz, A. M., Sanchez-Ramos, L., & Rhatigan, R. M. (2010) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181f74864 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- DeWaay, D.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-7
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050379279
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural history of uterine polyps and leiomyomata. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02007-0
- The paper
- DeWaay, D. (2002). Natural history of uterine polyps and leiomyomata. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02007-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.