Ovarian and extraovarian endometriosis-associated cancer
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical characteristics of women with endometriosis-associated intraperitoneal cancers, to assess differences based on the relationship of the cancer to the endometriosis, and to assess factors associated with survival. METHODS: A search of medical records at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1970 to 1999 identified patients who had synchronous endometriosis and intraperitoneal cancer. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were evaluated for differences based on the relationship of the cancer to the endometriosis and for correlation with survival. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients were identified: 25 patients with ovarian cancer arising in endometriosis, 21 with an extraovarian cancer arising in endometriosis, 33 patients with endometriosis and ovarian cancer in the same location but without a definite transition point, and 36 patients with ovarian cancer and incidental endometriosis. Women with extraovarian cancers arising in endometriosis were more likely to be postmenopausal (P <.001) and use hormone replacement (P <.001). The median age was 47 years, the most common histological tumor types were clear cell and endometrioid (23% each), and the most common stage was stage I (31%). The median survival was 35 months. Univariate survival analysis revealed that gravidity (P <.038), grade (P <.001), stage (P <.001), histology (P <.01), and type of chemotherapy (P <.011) correlated with survival. Multivariable analysis revealed that stage and gravidity independently predicted survival. CONCLUSION: Women with endometriosis-associated cancers are typically premenopausal, have a high incidence of endometrioid and clear cell histologies, and have early stage disease. Stage and gravidity independently predicted survival.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modesitt et al. (2002) observed transition points in endometriosis-associated tumors, where benign endometriotic glands blend with atypical and overtly malignant glands.
“The study by Modesitt et al. (2002) noted the presence of ‘‘transition points’’ in such tumors, where a benign endometriotic gland was observed blending with atypical and overtly malignant glands [16].”
From Malignancy in Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Is There a Way to Avoid It? A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 242
- Authors
- Modesitt, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- ORCID
- Modesitt, S
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 788-795
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044887932
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Keywords
- endometriosis-associated cancer, ovarian cancer, synchronous tumors, tumor stage, gravidity, endometrioid carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, hormone replacement therapy, postmenopausal women
- MeSH terms
- Combined Modality Therapy, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Carcinoma, Endometrioid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review