The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1991–1997
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in pregnancy-related mortality and risk factors for pregnancy-related deaths in the United States for the years 1991 through 1997. METHODS: In collaboration with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and state health departments, the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System, part of the Division of Reproductive Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has collected information on all reported pregnancy-related deaths occurring since 1979. Data include those present on death certificates and, when available, matching birth or fetal death certificates. Data are reviewed and coded by clinically experienced epidemiologists. The pregnancy-related mortality ratio was defined as pregnancy-related deaths per 100,000 live births. RESULTS: The reported pregnancy-related mortality ratio increased from 10.3 in 1991 to 12.9 in 1997. An increased risk of pregnancy-related death was found for black women, older women, and women with no prenatal care. The leading causes of death were embolism, hemorrhage, and other medical conditions, although the percent of all pregnancy-related deaths caused by hemorrhage declined from 28% in the early 1980s to 18% in the current study period. CONCLUSION: The reported pregnancy-related mortality ratio has increased, probably because of improved identification of pregnancy-related deaths. Black women continue to have an almost four-fold increased risk of pregnancy-related death, the greatest disparity among the maternal and child health indicators. Although review of pregnancy-related deaths by states remains an important public health function, such work must be expanded to identify factors that influence the survival of women with serious pregnancy complications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2011–2013
Creanga, A. A., Syverson, C., Seed, K., & Callaghan, W. M. (2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002114 · Cited by 1,044
Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 1998 to 2005
Berg, C. J., Callaghan, W. M., Syverson, C., & Henderson, Z. (2010) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181fdfb11 · Cited by 688
Self-citationPreventability of Pregnancy-Related Deaths: Results of a State-Wide Review
Berg, C. J., Harper, M. A., Atkinson, S. M., Bell, E. A., Brown, H. L., Hage, M. L., Mitra, A. G., Moise, K. J., & Callaghan, W. M. (2005) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000187894.71913.e8 · Cited by 498
Self-citationQuality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action
Koblinsky, M., Moyer, C. A., Calvert, C., Campbell, J., Campbell, O. M. R., Feigl, A. B., Graham, W. J., Hatt, L., Hodgins, S., Matthews, Z., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31333-2 · Cited by 481
Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now?
Creanga, A. A., Berg, C. J., Ko, J. Y., Farr, S. L., Tong, V. T., Bruce, F. C., & Callaghan, W. M. (2014) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2013.4617 · Cited by 397
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, C.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 289-296
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054990023
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1991–1997. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02587-5
- The paper
- Berg, C. (2003). Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1991–1997. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02587-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.