The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the United States
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether achieving pregnancy beyond maternal age of 50 years compromises fetal well-being and survival. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on all deliveries in the United States from 1997 to 1999. Four maternal age groups of 20-29 (young), 30-39 (mature), 40-49 (very mature), and 50 or more years (older) were constructed to assess risk gradients for fetal morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 539 deliveries among older mothers (aged 50 and above) were documented (four per 100,000). Among singleton gestations, the risks for low birth weight, preterm, and very preterm were tripled among older mothers, whereas the occurrence of very low birth weight, small size for gestational age, and fetal mortality were approximately doubled compared with those for young mothers. Older mothers also had greater risks for fetal morbidity and mortality than their immediate younger counterparts (40-49 year olds) except for very low birth weight. Among multiple gestations, the differences in risk between older and young mothers were lower than those noted among singletons. Still, compared with young mothers, older mothers had significantly higher risks of low birth weight, very low birth weight, very preterm, and small size for gestational age. Older mothers also had higher risk estimates for multiples than 40-49-year-old gravidas in terms of all fetal morbidity and mortality indices. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy beyond age 50 was associated with increased risks for the fetus. Our findings suggest that this age group is a distinct obstetric high-risk entity that requires special counseling before and after conception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pregnancy in the Sixth Decade of Life: Obstetric Outcomes in Women of Advanced Reproductive Age
Paulson, R. J., Boostanfar, R., Saadat, P., Mor, E., Tourgeman, D. E., Slater, C. C., Francis, M. M., & Jain, J. K. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.18.2320 · Cited by 258
Cited by
Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Flenady, V., Koopmans, L., Middleton, P., Frøen, J. F., Smith, G. C., Gibbons, K., Coory, M., Gordon, A., Ellwood, D., McIntyre, H. D., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62233-7 · Cited by 1,247
Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood
Schmidt, L., Sobotka, T., Bentzen, J. G., Nyboe Andersen, A., & on behalf of the ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr040 · Cited by 656
Advanced Maternal Age — How Old Is Too Old?
Heffner, L. J. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp048087 · Cited by 560
Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries
Flenady, V., Middleton, P., Smith, G. C., Duke, W., Erwich, J. J., Khong, T. Y., Neilson, J., Ezzati, M., Koopmans, L., Ellwood, D., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60064-0 · Cited by 490
The Perinatal Effects of Delayed Childbearing
Joseph, K. S., Allen, A. C., Dodds, L., Turner, L. A., Scott, H., & Liston, R. (2005) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000163256.83313.36 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- SALIHU, H.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1006-1014
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056908567
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00739-7
- The paper
- SALIHU, H. (2003). Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the United States. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00739-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.