The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of routine electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) of labor with intermittent auscultation, using the results of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: We identified RCTs by searching the MED-LINE data base for the period 1966-1994, contacting experts, and reviewing published references. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Our search identified 12 published RCTs addressing the efficacy and safety of EFM; no unpublished studies were found. The studies included 58,855 pregnant women and their 59,324 infants in both high- and low-risk pregnancies from ten clinical centers in the United States, Europe, Australia, and Africa. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were abstracted, and their accuracy was confirmed independently. A single reviewer assessed study quality based on criteria developed by others for RCTs. Data reported from similar studies were used to calculate a combined risk estimate for each of nine outcomes. Overall, a statistically significant decrease was associated with routine EFM for a 1-minute Apgar score less than 4 (relative risk [RR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.98) and neonatal seizures (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.30-0.82). The protective effect of EFM for a 1-minute Apgar score less than 4 was apparent only in the non-United States studies, and the protective effect for neonatal seizures was evident only in studies with high-quality scores. No significant differences were observed in 1-minute Apgar scores less than 7, rate of admissions to neonatal intensive care units, and perinatal death. An increase associated with the use of EFM was observed in the rate of cesarean delivery (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08-1.59) and total operative delivery (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.31). Risk of cesarean delivery was greatest in low-risk pregnancies. CONCLUSION: The only clinically significant benefit from the use of routine EFM was in the reduction of neonatal seizures. Because of the increase in cesarean and operative vaginal deliveries, the long-term benefit of this reduction must be evaluated in the decision reached jointly by the pregnant woman and her clinician to use EFM or intermittent auscultation during labor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial
Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., Blackburn, B., Silverman, B., Schroeder, B., Reitman, D., & Ambroz, A. (1981) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(81)90056-8 · Cited by 1,349
Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction
Lau, J., Antman, E. M., Jimenez-Silva, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199207233270406 · Cited by 1,140
Cited by
Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do
Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07373-7 · Cited by 586
Uncertain Value of Electronic Fetal Monitoring in Predicting Cerebral Palsy
Nelson, K. B., Dambrosia, J. M., Ting, T. Y., & Grether, J. K. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199603073341001 · Cited by 532
Temporal and demographic trends in cerebral palsy—Fact and fiction
Clark, S. L., & Hankins, G. D. V. (2003) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2003.204 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- THACKER, S., STROUP, D., & PETERSON, H.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 613-620
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033310746
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(95)80027-1
- The paper
- THACKER, S., STROUP, D., & PETERSON, H. (1995). Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(95)80027-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.