The duration and character of postpartum bleeding among breast-feeding women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the postpartum bleeding experience of a cohort of breast-feeding women and to compare it with the conventional definition of lochia. METHODS: Four hundred seventy-seven experienced breast-feeding women in Manila, the Philippines, were followed prospectively from delivery and recorded vaginal bleeding in a menstrual diary. The median duration of lochia was calculated using survival analysis. In addition, all bleeding separate from lochia within the first 8 weeks postpartum was noted. RESULTS: The median duration of lochia was 27 days and did not vary by age, parity, sex or weight of the infant, breast-feeding frequency, or level of supplementation. More than one-fourth of the women experienced a bleeding episode separated from the original lochial flow by at least 4 bleeding-free days and beginning no later than postpartum day 56. Ten breast-feeding women may have had their first menstrual bleed before day 56. CONCLUSIONS: Lochia lasted substantially longer than the conventional assumption of 2 weeks. It was common for postpartum bleeding to stop and start again or to be characterized by intermittent spotting or bleeding. Return of menses is rare among fully breast-feeding women in the first 8 weeks postpartum.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women are likely to experience episodes of bleeding for 4-6 weeks after a miscarriage and 4 weeks postpartum.
“Women are likely to experience episodes of bleeding for 4–6 weeks after a miscarriage and 4 weeks postpartum.11”
From Beyond menstrual hygiene: addressing vaginal bleeding throughout the life course in low and middle-income countries (2017) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- VISNESS, C., KENNEDY, K., & RAMOS, R.
- Affiliations
- Family Health International 360 (US)
- Corresponding author
- VISNESS, C
- ORCID
- VISNESS, C
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-163
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001751905
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- postpartum hemorrhage, breastfeeding, return of menses
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Humans, Lactation, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review