Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse

JACKSON, S, WEBER, A, HULL, T, MITCHINSON, A, WALTERS, M·1997·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: Study subjects were recruited prospectively, and all participants received questionnaires regarding bowel function and underwent a standardized history and physical examination. Fecal incontinence was defined as the involuntary loss of feces sufficient to be considered a problem by the patient. RESULTS: Forty-two subjects had fecal incontinence, an overall prevalence of 17%. One hundred seventy women had urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, or both, and 36 of these (21%) had fecal incontinence. One hundred (40%) women had urinary incontinence, of whom 31 also had fecal incontinence. Seventy women had isolated pelvic organ prolapse and five (7%) were incontinent of feces. Univariate analysis revealed that any degree of pelvic organ prolapse, increasing degrees of prolapse within each vaginal segment, urinary incontinence, advanced age, postmenopausal status, increased vaginal parity, prior hysterectomy, history of irritable bowel syndrome, and abnormal sphincter tone were associated significantly with fecal incontinence. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that only urinary incontinence (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, P < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9, 11.2), abnormal anal sphincter tone (OR 2.3, P = .04, 95% CI 1.1, 5.1), and irritable bowel syndrome (OR 8.3, P = .002, 95% CI 2.1, 32.8) were associated with fecal incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Clinicians providing health care to a similar group of women should inquire routinely and specifically about fecal incontinence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00499-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
JACKSON, S., WEBER, A., HULL, T., MITCHINSON, A., & WALTERS, M.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
1997-03
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
423-427
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036246033
Cited by
195
References
1
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00499-1
The paper
JACKSON, S., WEBER, A., HULL, T., MITCHINSON, A., & WALTERS, M. (1997). Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00499-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.