The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: Study subjects were recruited prospectively, and all participants received questionnaires regarding bowel function and underwent a standardized history and physical examination. Fecal incontinence was defined as the involuntary loss of feces sufficient to be considered a problem by the patient. RESULTS: Forty-two subjects had fecal incontinence, an overall prevalence of 17%. One hundred seventy women had urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, or both, and 36 of these (21%) had fecal incontinence. One hundred (40%) women had urinary incontinence, of whom 31 also had fecal incontinence. Seventy women had isolated pelvic organ prolapse and five (7%) were incontinent of feces. Univariate analysis revealed that any degree of pelvic organ prolapse, increasing degrees of prolapse within each vaginal segment, urinary incontinence, advanced age, postmenopausal status, increased vaginal parity, prior hysterectomy, history of irritable bowel syndrome, and abnormal sphincter tone were associated significantly with fecal incontinence. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that only urinary incontinence (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, P < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9, 11.2), abnormal anal sphincter tone (OR 2.3, P = .04, 95% CI 1.1, 5.1), and irritable bowel syndrome (OR 8.3, P = .002, 95% CI 2.1, 32.8) were associated with fecal incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Clinicians providing health care to a similar group of women should inquire routinely and specifically about fecal incontinence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A REVIEW OF GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS1
LEMESHOW, S., & HOSMER, D. W. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113284 · Cited by 1,947
Cited by
Operation for pelvic organ prolapse: a follow-up study
Tegerstedt, G., & Hammarström, M. (2004) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00468.x · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- JACKSON, S., WEBER, A., HULL, T., MITCHINSON, A., & WALTERS, M.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423-427
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036246033
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00499-1
- The paper
- JACKSON, S., WEBER, A., HULL, T., MITCHINSON, A., & WALTERS, M. (1997). Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00499-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.