The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus hysteroscopic endometrial resection in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device with that of endometrial resection on menstrual bleeding, patient satisfaction, and quality of life in menorrhagic women during 12 months of follow-up. METHODS: Seventy premenopausal women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding were enrolled in a prospective, open, parallel-group, controlled trial. They were randomized to either insertion of an intrauterine system releasing 20 micrograms/day of levonorgestrel (n = 35) or endometrial resection (n = 35). The women were evaluated at baseline, and thereafter, uterine bleeding was assessed monthly with a pictorial blood loss assessment chart. Clinical gynecologic examination was performed bimonthly, and the hematologic variables were measured at 6 and 12 months. On the latter occasion, the women were requested to rate the degree of satisfaction with the effect of their treatment and to complete the Short Form 36 General Health Survey questionnaire. RESULTS: Recurrent menorrhagia was observed at 12 months in four women in the intrauterine device group (including two with partial expulsion of the device) and in three women in the resection group. Compared with baseline values, at 1 year, the pictorial blood loss assessment chart score was reduced by 79% in the former group and by 89% in the latter. Amenorrhea or hypomenorrhea at 12 months was reported by 65% of the women with an intrauterine device compared with 71% who underwent endometrial resection. The degree of satisfaction with treatment was high in both groups, with 29 of 34 (85%) women being satisfied or very satisfied in the intrauterine device group versus 33 of 35 (94%) in the resection group. Health-related quality of life perception was not significantly different in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Somewhat less satisfactory results were obtained with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared with endometrial resection for dysfunctional uterine bleeding at 1 year of follow-up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart
HIGHAM, J. M., O'BRIEN, P. M. S., & SHAW, R. W. (1990) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb16249.x · Cited by 1,116
Ovarian function during use of a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD
Barbosa, I., Bakos, O., Olsson, S.-E., Odlind, V., & Johansson, E. D. B. (1990) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/0010-7824(90)90092-a · Cited by 142
Cited by
Gupta, J. K., Daniels, J. P., Middleton, L. J., Pattison, H. M., Prileszky, G., Roberts, T. E., Sanghera, S., Barton, P., Gray, R., Kai, J., et al. (2015) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta19880 · Cited by 399
Hurskainen, R., Teperi, J., Rissanen, P., Aalto, A.-M., Grenman, S., Kivelä, A., Kujansuu, E., Vuorma, S., Yliskoski, M., & Paavonen, J. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03615-1 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- CROSIGNANI, P., VERCELLINI, P., MOSCONI, P., OLDANI, S., CORTESI, I., & DEGIORGI, O.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-263
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037729051
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus hysteroscopic endometrial resection in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00226-3
- The paper
- CROSIGNANI, P., VERCELLINI, P., MOSCONI, P., OLDANI, S., CORTESI, I., & DEGIORGI, O. (1997). Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus hysteroscopic endometrial resection in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00226-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.