The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pregnancy Outcome and Weight Gain Recommendations for the Morbidly Obese Woman
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes between morbidly obese and nonobese women and to determine the effect of gestational weight gain on pregnancy outcome in morbidly obese women. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing 613 morbidly obese and 11,313 nonobese women who were delivered of a singleton live birth. Morbid obesity was defined as a body mass index greater than 35. The incidence of selected perinatal and neonatal outcomes was assessed for the two groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between morbid obesity and various measures of outcome while controlling for potential confounders. A subanalysis of the morbidly obese patients was performed to assess the effect of gestational weight gain on pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: Morbidly obese patients were more likely to experience pregnancy complications including diabetes, hypertension, preeclampsia, and arrest-of-labor disorders; however, these were not affected by gestational weight gain. Morbidly obese patients were more likely to experience fetal distress and meconium and to undergo cesarean delivery than their nonobese counterparts (P < .05). Weight gains of more than 25 lb were associated strongly with birth of a large for gestational age (LGA) neonate (P < .01); however, poor weight gain did not appear to increase the risk of delivery of a low birth weight neonate. CONCLUSION: Gestational weight gain was not associated with adverse perinatal outcome, but it did influence neonatal outcome. To reduce the risk of delivery of an LGA newborn, the optimal gestational weight gain for morbidly obese women should not exceed 25 lb.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies
Duckitt, K., & Harrington, D. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.e0 · Cited by 1,784
Maternal Obesity and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Chu, S. Y., Callaghan, W. M., Kim, S. Y., Schmid, C. H., Lau, J., England, L. J., & Dietz, P. M. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-2559a · Cited by 1,114
Torloni, M. R., Betrán, A. P., Horta, B. L., Nakamura, M. U., Atallah, A. N., Moron, A. F., & Valente, O. (2009) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2008.00541.x · Cited by 739
Siega-Riz, A. M., Viswanathan, M., Moos, M.-K., Deierlein, A., Mumford, S., Knaack, J., Thieda, P., Lux, L. J., & Lohr, K. N. (2009) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.002 · Cited by 708
Effect of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies
Bhattacharya, S., Campbell, D. M., Liston, W. A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2007) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-168 · Cited by 688
Metadata
- Authors
- Bianco, A.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-102
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3022574241
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pregnancy Outcome and Weight Gain Recommendations for the Morbidly Obese Woman. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00578-4
- The paper
- Bianco, A. (1998). Pregnancy Outcome and Weight Gain Recommendations for the Morbidly Obese Woman. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00578-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.