The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Before enrollment in a 4-year, randomized trial of combination hormone therapy to prevent coronary heart disease, 2763 participants completed questionnaires on prevalence and type of incontinence. We measured factors potentially associated with incontinence including demographics, reproductive and medical histories, height, weight, and waist-to-hip circumference ratio. We used multivariate logistic models to determine independent associations between those factors and weekly incontinence by type. RESULTS: The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) age of the participants was 67+/-7 years; 89% were white and 8% were black. Fifty-six percent reported weekly incontinence. In multivariate analyses, the prevalence of weekly stress incontinence was higher in white than black women (odds ratio [OR] 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 5.1), in women with higher body-mass index (BMI) (OR 1.1 per 5 units, 95% CI 1.0, 1.3), and higher waist-to-hip ratio (OR 1.2 per 0.1 unit, 95% CI 1.0, 1.4). The prevalence of weekly urge incontinence was higher in older women (OR 1.2 per 5 years, 95% CI 1.1, 1.3), diabetic women (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 2.0) and women who had reported two or more urinary tract infections in the prior year (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1, 3.6). CONCLUSION: Stress and urge incontinence are common in postmenopausal women and have different risk factors, suggesting that approaches to risk-factor modification and prevention also might differ and should be specific to types of incontinence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hulley, S. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.7.605 · Cited by 6,216
Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS)
Grady, D., Applegate, W., Bush, T., Furberg, C., Riggs, B., & Hulley, S. B. (1998) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00010-5 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Cited by
Garvey, W. T., Mechanick, J. I., Brett, E. M., Garber, A. J., Hurley, D. L., Jastreboff, A. M., Nadolsky, K., Pessah-Pollack, R., & Plodkowski, R. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161365.gl · Cited by 1,914
Norton, P., & Brubaker, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)67925-7 · Cited by 579
Urinary Incontinence: Does it Increase Risk for Falls and Fractures?
Brown, J. S., Vittinghoff, E., Wyman, J. F., Stone, K. L., Nevitt, M. C., Ensrud, K. E., & Grady, D. (2000) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04744.x · Cited by 557
Self-citationAnnual Direct Cost of Urinary Incontinence
Wilson, L., Brown, J. S., Shin, G. P., Luc, K.-O., & Subak, L. L. (2001) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00006250-200109000-00007 · Cited by 420
Self-citationRisk factors for urinary incontinence among middle-aged women
Danforth, K. N., Townsend, M. K., Lifford, K., Curhan, G. C., Resnick, N. M., & Grodstein, F. (2006) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.051 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-70
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063768742
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00263-x
- The paper
- Brown, J. (1999). Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in postmenopausal women. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00263-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.