The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What is synergy?
Abstract
Abstract Background This study aimed to examine the effect of pool walking on renal function in pregnant women. Methods Fifteen pregnant women (mean gestational age, 37.8 weeks) walked in a pool (depth 1.3 m) for 1 h. A few days later, they walked on a street for 1 h. Within each activity, the starting and ending levels of plasma renin activity (PRA) and serum aldosterone (SA) were compared using paired t-test. Total urine volume, creatinine clearance, and change in PRA levels between each activity were compared by t-test. Regression coefficients for total urine volume and creatinine clearance during pool walking were estimated by linear regression and additionally controlled for the change in PRA levels. Land walking served as the reference group. Results Within each activity, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone levels were suppressed during pool walking: the mean starting and ending values of PRA and SA were 6.8 vs. 5.5 ng/mL/h (p=0.002) and 654 vs. 473 pg/mL (p=0.02), respectively. Compared to land walking, the decrease in PRA level was more evident in pool walking (−1.27 vs. 0.81 ng/mL/h, p=0.004), resulting in higher total urine volume and creatinine clearance in pool walking (both p Conclusions Pool walking may temporarily improve renal function in pregnant women, partly through the suppressed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000010618 Unique Identifier: UMIN000009051
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method
Chou, T.-C. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-1947 · Cited by 5,739
Chou, T.-C. (2006) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.10 · Cited by 5,163
Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects.
Russo, E. B. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01238.x · Cited by 1,535
Synergy research: approaching a new generation of phytopharmaceuticals.
Wagner, H., & Ulrich-Merzenich, G. (2009) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2008.12.018 · Cited by 1,296
Analysis of drug combinations: current methodological landscape
Foucquier, J., & Guedj, M. (2015) · Pharmacology Research & Perspectives · doi:10.1002/prp2.149 · Cited by 1,115
Metadata
- Authors
- Berenbaum, M. C.
- Venue
- Pharmacological Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-141
- ISSN
- 0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4407751074
- Cited by
- 1,414
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 85.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is synergy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0031-6997(25)00026-2
- The paper
- Berenbaum, M. C. (1989). What is synergy? Pharmacological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-6997(25)00026-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.