Cited by 300Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseCognitive Abilities and Testing

Cognitive demand and blood glucose

Scholey, Andrew B, Harper, Susan, Kennedy, David O·2001·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Previous research has identified that glucose administration can enhance cognitive performance, especially during more intense cognitive processing. There appears to be a reciprocal relationship between falling glucose levels and cognitive performance, particularly under conditions of cognitive demand. The present placebo-controlled, double-blind, balanced, crossover study examined the possibility that a high cognitive load may produce changes in blood glucose levels. A secondary aim was to examine the effects of glucose on tasks of varying cognitive demand load. The effects of a glucose drink on participants' performance of a serial subtraction task (computerised Serial Sevens), a somatically matched control task (key-pressing), a short interval Word Memory task and a Word Retrieval (Verbal Fluency) task were assessed. The change in blood glucose during the demanding computerised Serial Sevens was compared to the change occurring during the key-pressing control. Glucose consumption significantly improved performance on Serial Sevens, with a trend for improved performance on Word Retrieval and no effect on the Word Memory task. Compared with the control task, Serial Sevens resulted in a significant reduction in blood glucose in both drink conditions. This accelerated decay was significantly greater following glucose than placebo. It is suggested that the amount of cognitive load associated with task performance is an index of its sensitivity to enhancement by glucose. Furthermore, a period of intense cognitive processing leads to a measurable decrease in levels of peripherally measured blood glucose, which may be linked to increased neural energy expenditure. However, the relative contribution of central and peripheral (e.g. cardiac) activity to this effect has yet to be determined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00476-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 300

Authors
Scholey, A. B., Harper, S., & Kennedy, D. O.
Affiliations
Northumbria University (GB)
Corresponding author
Scholey, Andrew B
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-07
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
585-592
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167163400
Cited by
300
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
glucose, cognitive demand, cognitive load, blood glucose, glucose administration, cognitive performance, serial subtraction, word retrieval, verbal fluency, word memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Cognition, Female, Glucose, Humans, Male, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review