Antidepressant Effect of Ingested Nicotine in Female Rats of Flinders Resistant and Sensitive Lines
Abstract
Both major depression and depressive symptoms are associated with a high rate of nicotine dependence, and a history of major depression has an adverse impact on smoking cessation. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether continuous ingestion of nicotine affects indices of depressive behavior in the rat. We compared cholinergic- and serotonergic-hypersensitive Flinders Sensitive Line rats (FSL), a genetic animal model of depression, with their control counterparts, Flinders Resistant Line rats (FRL). Female rats of both lines were allowed access to a solution of nicotine bitartrate (100 microg/mL) in tap water for 14 days. Subsequent behavioral testing revealed striking effects of continuous ingestion of nicotine on depressive-like behavior of both lines. FSL and FRL rats that ingested nicotine for 14 days displayed less immobility in the 10-min forced-swim test (an index of depressive-like behavior) relative to the animals of both lines that were not exposed to nicotine or exposed to nicotine for shorter periods of time. This finding indicates that ingested nicotine has antidepressant properties that are independent of the genetic difference between FSL and FRL female rats. Animal studies on nicotine ingestion and withdrawal may become an important source of insights into the comorbidity of depression and nicotine self-administration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chronic nicotine administration can elicit antidepressant-like effects in rats in the learned helplessness and forced swim paradigms.
“Animal studies have also shown that chronic nicotine administration can elicit antidepressant-like effects in rats both in the learned helplessness (Semba et al., 1998) and the forced swim (Djuric et al., 1999; Tizabi et al., 1999) paradigms.”
From It is not “either/or”: Activation and desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors both contribute to behaviors related to nicotine addiction and mood (2008) · cites this paper as Djuric et al., 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 32 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Djurić, V. J., Dunn, E., Overstreet, D. H., Dragomir, A., & Steiner, M.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Djurić, Veljko J
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 533-537
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026185296
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- nicotine, antidepressant effects, depression, Flinders Sensitive Line, nicotine dependence, smoking cessation, forced swim test, immobility, nicotine self-administration, female rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Cotinine, Depressive Disorder, Drinking, Female, Nicotine, Rats, Inbred Strains, Species Specificity, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Swimming, Weight Gain, Nicotinic Agonists, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review