Cited by 150Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationTherapeutic Uses of Natural ElementsMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Evidence for Effective Hydrotherapy

Geytenbeek, Jenny·2002·Physiotherapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9406(05)60134-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 150

Authors
Geytenbeek, J.
Corresponding author
Geytenbeek, Jenny
Venue
Physiotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
88
Issue
9
Pages
514-529
ISSN
0031-9406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021055317
Cited by
150
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physiotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
hydrotherapy, clinical effectiveness, quality of evidence, pain, functional outcome, affect, neurological disorders, older adults, rheumatic conditions, chronic low back pain, joint mobility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review