The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spectrofluorimetric determination of chlorophylls and pheopigments using parallel factor analysis
Abstract
In this study, parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) was applied to fluorescence excitation emission matrices (EEM) of chlorophylls and pheopigments dissolved in acetone:water (9:1). The excitation wavelength range was from 350 to 500 nm and the emission was recorded from 600 to 730 nm. Nine standards, comprising mixtures of six analytes, were decomposed into a six-component PARAFAC model. Each component resembled the corresponding EEM of the pure analyte, demonstrating the uniqueness properties of PARAFAC. The score matrix obtained from the model was used for calibration and prediction of an independent set of standards and for eleven samples collected in the Baltic proper. The results obtained by the proposed method were compared to classical least squares (CLS) and to predictions by reference methods (HPLC and visible spectroscopy). For the independent set of standards the proposed method and CLS performed equal well in terms of predictive ability. But for the samples the proposed method yielded results that were in good agreement to the reference methods, whereas CLS failed. Also the so-called "second-order advantage" was examined, showing that not all constituents must be included in the calibration set. The concentration range was for chlorophyll a varied between 10 and 75 mug l(-1), and similar for the other analytes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluorescence spectroscopy can distinguish several chlorophylls (a, b, and c) and their degradation products (pheophytin a and b, and pheoporphyrin c) in acetone:water model solutions.
“Other reports show the potential of this technique to distinguish several chlorophylls (a, b, and c) and their degradation products (pheophytin a and b, and pheoporphyrin c in acetone: water model‐solutions (Moberg et al., 2001) and the possibility to estimate algal blooms (Gregor and Maršálek, 2005; Ziegmann et al., 2010).”
From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Moberg et al., 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry
Sá, M., Ferrer‐Ledo, N., Gao, F., Bertinetto, C. G., Jansen, J., Crespo, J. G., Wijffels, R. H., Barbosa, M., & Galinha, C. F. (2022) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.14013 · Cited by 29
“Other reports show the potential of this technique to distinguish several chlorophylls (a, b, and c) and their degradation products (pheophytin a and b, and pheoporphyrin c in acetone: water model-solutions (Moberg et al., 2001) and the possibility to estimate algal blooms (Gregor and Mar s alek, 2005; Ziegmann et al.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Moberg, L., Robertsson, G., & Karlberg, B.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Karlberg, Bo
- Venue
- Talanta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-03-30
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-170
- ISSN
- 0039-9140 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998991970
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Talanta (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Computational Mathematics › Tensor decomposition and applications
- Keywords
- chlorophyll, phaeopigments, chlorophyll a, fluorescence excitation-emission matrix, PARAFAC, fluorescence spectroscopy, multicomponent analysis, second-order advantage, calibration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review