Cited by 14Renal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Lipoprotein glomerulopathy: a new apolipoprotein-E-related disease that recurs after renal transplantation

Mourad, G., Cristol, J.P., Turc-Baron, C., Djamali, A.·1997·Transplantation Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0041-1345(97)00409-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mourad, G., Cristol, J. P., Turc-Baron, C., & Djamali, A.
Affiliations
Hôpital Lapeyronie (FR)
Venue
Transplantation Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-08
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
2376
ISSN
0041-1345 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042041657
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transplantation Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
lipoprotein glomerulopathy, apolipoprotein E, glomerular disease, kidney transplantation, recurrence, familial disease, Japanese patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Lipoproteins, Recurrence, Kidney Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review