Cited by 147Retinal Development and DisordersRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsGlaucoma and retinal disorders

Animal models in research on retinal degenerations: past progress and future hope

Open access
Chader, Gerald J·2002·Vision Research

Abstract

The retinal degenerations (RDs) are a family of inherited retinal degenerative diseases (dystrophies) that lead to vision loss. Although phenotypically very different, the RDs have several characteristics in common. They all are caused by gene mutations or at least have a genetic component in the etiology. They all lead to photoreceptor dysfunction, many leading to the death of both rod and cone photoreceptors. The mechanism of cell death in most of the RDs seems to be through the process of apoptosis. It is estimated that more than fifteen million people around the world have vision loss due to an inherited RD. Many of these are patients with the dry form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who retain partial functional vision. However, some have other degenerative conditions such as retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis or wet AMD and can suffer from severe vision loss or total blindness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00212-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 147

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Organisciak, D. T., Darrow, R. M., Bicknell, I. R., Jiang, Y.-L., Pickford, M., & Blanks, J. C. (1991). Protection against retinal light damage by natural and synthetic antioxidants. In J. G. Hollyfield, R. E. Anderson, & M. M. LaVail (Eds.), Retinal degen- erations (pp. 189-201). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Authors
Chader, G. J.
Affiliations
Foundation Fighting Blindness (US)
Corresponding author
Chader, Gerald J
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
393-399
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029073745
Cited by
147
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
retinal degeneration, animal models, photoreceptor cell death, apoptosis, retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis, age-related macular degeneration, vision loss, genetic mutations
MeSH terms
Animals, Chickens, Macular Degeneration, Retinal Degeneration, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Swine, Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, Models, Animal, Animals, Genetically Modified, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review