Animal models in research on retinal degenerations: past progress and future hope
Open accessAbstract
The retinal degenerations (RDs) are a family of inherited retinal degenerative diseases (dystrophies) that lead to vision loss. Although phenotypically very different, the RDs have several characteristics in common. They all are caused by gene mutations or at least have a genetic component in the etiology. They all lead to photoreceptor dysfunction, many leading to the death of both rod and cone photoreceptors. The mechanism of cell death in most of the RDs seems to be through the process of apoptosis. It is estimated that more than fifteen million people around the world have vision loss due to an inherited RD. Many of these are patients with the dry form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who retain partial functional vision. However, some have other degenerative conditions such as retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis or wet AMD and can suffer from severe vision loss or total blindness.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The arrd2/arrd2 phenotype has features similar to human progressive rod-cone degeneration and AMD.
“This phenotype has features similar to human progressive rod-cone degeneration and AMD”
From Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (2010) · cites this paper as Chader, 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 147
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Organisciak, D. T., Darrow, R. M., Bicknell, I. R., Jiang, Y.-L., Pickford, M., & Blanks, J. C. (1991). Protection against retinal light damage by natural and synthetic antioxidants. In J. G. Hollyfield, R. E. Anderson, & M. M. LaVail (Eds.), Retinal degen- erations (pp. 189-201). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Authors
- Chader, G. J.
- Affiliations
- Foundation Fighting Blindness (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chader, Gerald J
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 393-399
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029073745
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vision Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Keywords
- retinal degeneration, animal models, photoreceptor cell death, apoptosis, retinitis pigmentosa, Leber congenital amaurosis, age-related macular degeneration, vision loss, genetic mutations
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chickens, Macular Degeneration, Retinal Degeneration, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Swine, Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, Models, Animal, Animals, Genetically Modified, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review