Cited by 95

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pilot scale treatment of textile wastewater by combined process (fluidized biofilm process–chemical coagulation–electrochemical oxidation)

Kim, Tak-Hyun, Park, Chulhwan, Lee, Jinwon, Shin, Eung-Bai, Kim, Sangyong·2002·Water Research

Abstract

The performance of pilot scale combined process of fluidized biofilm process, chemical coagulation and electrochemical oxidation for textile wastewater treatment was studied. In order to enhance biological treatment efficiency, two species of microbes, which can degrade textile wastewater pollutants efficiently, were isolated and applied to the system with supporting media. FeCl3 x 6H2O, pH 6 and 3.25 x 10(-3) mol/l were determined as optimal chemical coagulation condition and 25 mM NaCl of electrolyte concentration, 2.1 mA/cm2 of current density and 0.71/min of flow rate were chosen for the most efficient electrochemical oxidation at pilot scale treatment. The fluidized biofilm process showed 68.8% of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and 54.5% of color removal efficiency, even though using relatively low MLSS concentration and short sludge retention time. COD and color removals of 95.4% and 98.5% were achieved by overall combined process. The contribution of fluidized biofilm process to the overall combined process was increased over 25.7% of COD reduction and 20.5% of color reduction by adopting support media in biological treatment. It can be thought that the fluidized biofilm process was effective, and pollutant loading on post-treatment was pretty much decreased by this system. This combined process was highly competitive in comparison to the other similar combined systems. It was concluded that this combined process was successfully employed and much effectively decreased p…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00113-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Isolated or acclimatized microbes are usually required for effective biological pretreatment.

    “especially isolated/ acclimatized microbes are usually required for effective biological pretreatment.100,115”

    From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [100]

  • High concentrations of suspended or colloidal solids in wastewater may impede advanced oxidation processes, necessitating sufficient prior removal by physico-chemical treatment.

    “For instance, the fact that high concentrations of suspended or colloidal solids in the wastewater may impede the advanced oxidation processes, necessitates sufficient prior removal of these materials by physico-chemical treatment.43,100”

    From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [100]

  • The dose of coagulants and the quantity of chemical sludge after biological treatment are smaller than in coagulation followed by biological treatment.

    “On the other hand, the dose of coagulants and consequently the quantity of the chemical sludge after biological treatment are smaller compared to those in coagulation followed by biological treatment.57,75,100”

    From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [100]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Lin, 1996, Continuous treatment of textile wastewater by combined coagulation, electrochemical oxidation and activated sludge, Water Res, 30, 587, 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00210-3 · DOI
  2. Ahn, 1999, Dyestuff wastewater treatment using chemical oxidation, physical adsorption and fixed bed biofilm process, Process Biochem, 34, 429, 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00111-3 · DOI
  3. Hsu, 1997, Activated sludge treatment of dispersed dye factory wastewater, J Environ Sci Health, 32, 1921
  4. Banat, 1996, Microbial decolorization of textile-dye-containing effluents, Bioresource Technol, 58, 217, 10.1016/S0960-8524(96)00113-7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kapdan, 2000, Comparison of white-rot fungi cultures for decolorization of textile dyestuff, Bioprocess Eng, 22, 347, 10.1007/s004490050742 · DOI
  6. Sugimori, 1999, Removal of disperse dyes by the fungus Cunninghamella polymorpha, J Biosci Bioeng, 87, 252, 10.1016/S1389-1723(99)89024-0 · DOI
  7. Shan, 1998, Aerobic biotreatment of wastewater from dimethyl terephthalate plant using biomass support particles, J Ferment Bioeng, 86, 424
  8. Rajeshwar, 1994, Electrochemistry and the environment, J Appl Electrochem, 24, 1077, 10.1007/BF00241305 · DOI
  9. Cossu, 1998, Electrochemical treatment of landfill leachate, Environ Sci Technol, 32, 3570, 10.1021/es971094o · DOI
  10. Chiang, 1997, Electrochemical oxidation pretreatment of refractory organic pollutants, Water Sci Technol, 36, 123, 10.2166/wst.1997.0499 · DOI
  11. Panizza, 2000, Electrochemical treatment of wastewater containing polyaromatic organic pollutants, Water Res, 34, 2601, 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00145-7 · DOI
  12. Vlyssides, 1998, Electrochemical oxidation of a textile dye and finishing wastewater using Pt/Ti electrode, J Environ Sci Health A, 33, 847, 10.1080/10934529809376765 · DOI
  13. Vlyssides, 1999, Electrochemical oxidation of a textile dye wastewater using a Pt/Ti electrode, J Hazardous Mater B, 70, 41, 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00130-2 · DOI
  14. Naumczyk, 1996, Electrochemical treatment of textile wastewater, Water Sci Technol, 34, 17, 10.2166/wst.1996.0258 · DOI
  15. Abdo, 1987, Anodic oxidation of a direct dye in an electrochemical reactor, J Environ Sci Health A, 22, 27
  16. Sutton, 1994, Activated carbon based biological fluidized beds for contaminated water and wastewater treatment, Water Sci Technol, 29, 309, 10.2166/wst.1994.0774 · DOI
  17. Nicolaou, 1992, Treatment of wastewater from the textile industry, Water Sci Technol, 25, 31, 10.2166/wst.1992.0006 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Choi, 1999, Isolation of dye-degrading for the treatment of dyeing wastewater and dye decoloring, Korean J Biotechnol Bioeng, 14, 731
  19. Lidia, 2001, Performance of electrochemical reactor for treatment of tannery wastewater, Chem Eng Sci, 56, 1579, 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00385-7 · DOI
  20. Panizza, 1999, Electrochemical remediation of copper (II) from an industrial effluent part II: three-dimensional foam electrodes, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 27, 299, 10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00002-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, T.-H., Park, C., Lee, J., Shin, E.-B., & Kim, S.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
36
Issue
16
Pages
3979-3988
ISSN
0043-1354
Cited by
95
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review