Cited by 141Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies

Egg and larval quality criteria as predictive measures for juvenile production in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.)

Kjørsvik, E., Hoehne-Reitan, K., Reitan, K.I.·2003·Aquaculture

Abstract

Although much effort has been made to evaluate criteria for marine egg and larval quality, the significance of poor egg quality for the results in the final juvenile production has not been clarified. The aim of our experiments with turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) was to determine whether the initially observed egg quality affected offspring viability and normal development up to the juvenile stage. Eggs from each of six individual females were divided into three replicate groups, and the eggs in each replicate was quality evaluated according to fertilization rates and the ratio of normal cell cleavages (blastomere morphology) at the 8-32 cell stage. The condition of yolk-sac larvae was tested by an acute high salinity stress test, and the larvae were fed according to our standard feeding regime with microalgae, enriched rotifers and Artemia nauplii. Significant positive correlations were found between observed egg quality characteristics and hatching rates, larval tolerance to acute stress, and to survival, metamorphosis and juvenile pigmentation. Larvae hatching from poor quality egg groups thus had a lower viability and were less able to develop normally to the juvenile stage than larvae from good quality egg groups. Our conclusion is that egg quality observed as fertilization rate and rates of normal blastomeres at early egg stages may be a useful predictive tool for evaluation of the potential juvenile production in turbot.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0044-8486(03)00492-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kjørsvik, E., Hoehne-Reitan, K., & Reitan, K. I.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Kjørsvik, E.
Venue
Aquaculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
227
Issue
1-4
Pages
9-20
ISSN
0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042629293
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Keywords
turbot, egg quality, larval quality, fertilization rate, hatchability, larval survival, metamorphosis, juvenile production, microalgae feeding, rotifers, Artemia nauplii

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review