American Indians and sentencing disparity: An Arizona test
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many Native American communities have long been beset by high rates of violent crime, much of it connected to alcohol and drugs.
“Furthermore, many Native American communities have long been beset by high rates of violent crime, much of it connected to alcohol and drugs (Alvarez & Bachman 1996, Dobie 2011).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman 1996
Negative stereotypes of Native Americans have perpetuated and encouraged general anti-Native American criminal justice system bias.
“Others have argued that negative stereotypes of Native Americans have perpetuated and encouraged general anti-Native American criminal justice system bias (Alvarez & Bachman 1996, Lieber et al. 2007, Perry 2006, Rouse & Hanson 1991, Zatz et al. 1991).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman 1996
Existing research has largely conceptualized the Native American experience through a racial/ethnic framework.
“Existing research has largely conceptualized the Native American experience through a racial/ethnic framework”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman 1996
Native Americans are often stereotyped as disreputable others, characterized as lazy, alcoholic, and violent.
“Native Americans are often stereotyped as disreputable others, characterized as lazy, alcoholic, and violent (Alvarez & Bachman 1996, Holmes & Antell 2005, Perry 2006, Snipp 1992).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman 1996
Alvarez & Bachman (1996) found that Native Americans received longer sentences for robbery and burglary, whereas whites received longer sentences for homicide.
“their crime-specific models found that Native Americans received longer sentences for robbery and burglary, whereas whites received longer sentences for homicide.”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman (1996)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Alvarez, A., & Bachman, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- University of Delaware (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Criminal Justice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 549-561
- ISSN
- 0047-2352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058236695
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Keywords
- sentencing disparities, Native Americans, sentencing, homicide, robbery, burglary, sexual assault, theft, assault, ethnic minorities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review