Cited by 77Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyEducation Discipline and Inequality

American Indians and sentencing disparity: An Arizona test

Alvarez, Alexander, Bachman, Ronet D.·1996·Journal of Criminal Justice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0047-2352(96)00039-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many Native American communities have long been beset by high rates of violent crime, much of it connected to alcohol and drugs.

    “Furthermore, many Native American communities have long been beset by high rates of violent crime, much of it connected to alcohol and drugs (Alvarez & Bachman 1996, Dobie 2011).”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman 1996

  • Negative stereotypes of Native Americans have perpetuated and encouraged general anti-Native American criminal justice system bias.

    “Others have argued that negative stereotypes of Native Americans have perpetuated and encouraged general anti-Native American criminal justice system bias (Alvarez & Bachman 1996, Lieber et al. 2007, Perry 2006, Rouse & Hanson 1991, Zatz et al. 1991).”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman 1996

  • Existing research has largely conceptualized the Native American experience through a racial/ethnic framework.

    “Existing research has largely conceptualized the Native American experience through a racial/ethnic framework”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman 1996

  • Native Americans are often stereotyped as disreputable others, characterized as lazy, alcoholic, and violent.

    “Native Americans are often stereotyped as disreputable others, characterized as lazy, alcoholic, and violent (Alvarez & Bachman 1996, Holmes & Antell 2005, Perry 2006, Snipp 1992).”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman 1996

  • Alvarez & Bachman (1996) found that Native Americans received longer sentences for robbery and burglary, whereas whites received longer sentences for homicide.

    “their crime-specific models found that Native Americans received longer sentences for robbery and burglary, whereas whites received longer sentences for homicide.”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Alvarez & Bachman (1996)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 77

Authors
Alvarez, A., & Bachman, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Venue
Journal of Criminal Justice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-01
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
549-561
ISSN
0047-2352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058236695
Cited by
77
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
Keywords
sentencing disparities, Native Americans, sentencing, homicide, robbery, burglary, sexual assault, theft, assault, ethnic minorities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review